ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2023
The role of eye-specific attention in ocular dominance plasticity.
Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Visually guided voluntary actions boost short-term ocular dominance plasticity.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Attention can shift the reference eye under binocular fusion failure: A case report.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- The pulvinar regulates plasticity in human visual cortex.Science advances · 2025Article
- Monocular delay during visually guided actions is as effective as monocular deprivation in driving ocular dominance plasticity.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- An anti-Hebbian model for binocular visual plasticity and its attentional modulation.Communications biology · 2025Article
- The interplay between Hebbian and homeostatic plasticity in the adult visual cortex.The Journal of physiology · 2025Article
- Ocular Dominance Plasticity: A Mini-Review.Eye and brain · 2025Review
- Article
- Adaptation of Ocular Opponency Neurons Mediates Attention-Induced Ocular Dominance Plasticity.Neuroscience bulletin · 2024Article
- Negligible contribution of adaptation of ocular opponency neurons to the effect of short-term monocular deprivation.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Effect of fasting on short-term visual plasticity in adult humans.The European journal of neuroscience · 2023Article
- The shift in sensory eye dominance from short-term monocular deprivation exhibits no dependence on test spatial frequency.Eye and vision (London, England) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is well known how selective attention biases information processing in real time, but few work investigates the aftereffects of prolonged attention, let alone the underlying neural mechanisms. To examine perceptual aftereffect after prolonged attention to a monocular pathway, movie images played normally were presented to normal adult's one eye (attended eye), while movie images of the same episode but played backwards were presented to the opposite eye (unattended eye). One hour of watching this dichoptic movie caused a shift of perceptual ocular dominance towards the unattended eye. Interestingly, the aftereffect positively correlated with the advantage of neural activity for the attended-eye over unattended-eye signals at the frontal electrodes measured with steady-state visual evoked potentials. Moreover, the aftereffect disappeared when interocular competition was minimized during adaptation. These results suggest that top-down eye-specific attention can induce ocular dominance plasticity through binocular rivalry mechanisms. The present study opens the route to explain at least part of short-term ocular dominance plasticity with the ocular-opponency-neuron model, which may be an interesting complement to the homeostatic compensation theory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.