ArticleThe Journal of manual & manipulative therapy2022
Reliability and difference in neck extensor muscles strength measured by a portable dynamometer in individuals with and without chronic neck pain.
Article in The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThere are limited reports about the reliability of measuring neck extensor muscle strength using a portable dynamometer in neck pain patients. The aims of the current study were 1) to investigate intra- and inter-rater reliability of neck extensor isometric strength measurement using a portable dynamometer in patients with chronic nonspecific neck pain (CNSNP) and 2) to compare neck extensor isometric strength in participants with and without CNSNP.
methodsGuidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were followed. Two examiners received a 15-minute training before enrollment. Inter-rater reliability was assessed with a 10-minute interval between measurements, and intra-rater reliability was assessed with a 10-day interval. Three trials were assessed and examiners were blind to the strength values (in Newtons) from other sessions of 20 individuals with CNSNP (mean±SD= 37.9 ± 9.8y; Neck Disability Index 29.2 ± 7.4%) and 20 individuals with other musculoskeletal disorders (mean ± SD = 32.8 ± 46.2y).
resultsIntra-rater reliability was excellent with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)(3,1) of 0.95 (CI:0.90-0.97) and inter-rater reliability was good to excellent with ICC(2,1) of 0.88 (CI:0.77-0.94) in CNSNP. No significant difference of neck extensor strength was found between CNSNP (93.27N±31.94) and Individuals without CNSNP (111.43N±40.11) (p > 0.05).
conclusionA portable dynamometer is a reliable tool for measuring maximal isometric neck extension strength in individuals with CNSNP. Slightly but no significant differences of neck extensor strength values between individuals with and without CNSNP. Future studies are needed to assess the generalizability of the findings in patients with other muscle deconditioning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.