Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35332743›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2022

Evaluation of a pipeline for simulation, reconstruction, and classification in ultrasound-aided diffuse optical tomography of breast tumors.

Giuseppe Di Sciacca, Giulia Maffeis, Andrea Farina, Alberto Dalla Mora, Antonio Pifferi, Paola Taroni, Simon Arridge

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06468566 (Identification of Benign and Malignant Breast Nodules Using Opalogram Ultrasonography), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06468566 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Identification of Benign and Malignant Breast Nodules Using Opalogram Ultrasonography: A Multicenter Study

TypeobservationalSponsorXin-Wu CuiRan2024 to 2026Enrolled2,000ConditionsBreast Cancer FemaleArmsUltrasound light scattering imaging equipment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Giuseppe Di SciaccaUniversity College London, Department of Computer Science, London, United Kingdom.
Giulia MaffeisPolitecnico di Milano, Dipartimento di Fisica, Milano, Italy.
Andrea FarinaIstituto di Fotonica e Nanotecnologie, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Milano, Italy.
Alberto Dalla MoraPolitecnico di Milano, Dipartimento di Fisica, Milano, Italy.
Antonio PifferiPolitecnico di Milano, Dipartimento di Fisica, Milano, Italy.
Paola TaroniPolitecnico di Milano, Dipartimento di Fisica, Milano, Italy.
Simon ArridgeUniversity College London, Department of Computer Science, London, United Kingdom.
Politecnico di Milano · ITUniversity College London · GBIstituto di Fotonica e Nanotecnologie · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

significanceDiffuse optical tomography is an ill-posed problem. Combination with ultrasound can improve the results of diffuse optical tomography applied to the diagnosis of breast cancer and allow for classification of lesions.

aimTo provide a simulation pipeline for the assessment of reconstruction and classification methods for diffuse optical tomography with concurrent ultrasound information. APPROACH: A set of breast digital phantoms with benign and malignant lesions was simulated building on the software VICTRE. Acoustic and optical properties were assigned to the phantoms for the generation of B-mode images and optical data. A reconstruction algorithm based on a two-region nonlinear fitting and incorporating the ultrasound information was tested. Machine learning classification methods were applied to the reconstructed values to discriminate lesions into benign and malignant after reconstruction.

resultsThe approach allowed us to generate realistic US and optical data and to test a two-region reconstruction method for a large number of realistic simulations. When information is extracted from ultrasound images, at least 75% of lesions are correctly classified. With ideal two-region separation, the accuracy is higher than 80%.

conclusionsA pipeline for the generation of realistic ultrasound and diffuse optics data was implemented. Machine learning methods applied to a optical reconstruction with a nonlinear optical model and morphological information permit to discriminate malignant lesions from benign ones.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsTomography, OpticalBreastFemaleHumansPhantoms, ImagingUltrasonographybreast cancerbreast digital phantomdiffuse optical tomographylesion classificationultrasound

Identifiers

PMID35332743
PMCPMC8943242
OpenAlexW4220866867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.