Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35332740›Full record

ReviewSichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition2022

[Research Updates: Standardized Reporting and Evaluation Instruments for Postoperative Complications].

Yi-Hao Zhu, Fei Wang, Yi Zhao, Tao Zhu

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yi-Hao ZhuDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Fei WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Yi ZhaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Tao ZhuDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postoperative complications are important indicators for evaluating surgical outcomes, and mortality and the incidence of various specific complications are often used to measure the efficacy of surgical and perioperative management strategies. With the progress of medical technology, there has been a dramatic decline in mortality and the incidence of complications. As a result, reporting and evaluation in the traditional methods no longer meets the actual needs of the world. There has arisen an urgent need for an instrument of standardized reporting and evaluation. The instrument should be aligned with the actual circumstances and should represent the patient's overall burden of postoperative complications. We herein reviewed the latest research findings on Clavien-Dindo Classification (CDC) system and comprehensive complication index (CCI), two instruments of standardized reporting and evaluation of postoperative complications, and discussed the space for improvement and prospects of application of CDC and CCI.

Indexed as

Postoperative ComplicationsHumansAdverse eventClavien-Dindo classificationComprehensive complication indexEvaluating instrumentPostoperative complication

Identifiers

PMID35332740
PMCPMC10409346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.