Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35332688›Full record

ArticleBirth defects research2022

Identifying possible inaccuracy in reported birth head circumference measurements among infants in the US Zika Pregnancy and Infant Registry.

Nicole M Roth, Kate R Woodworth, Shana Godfred-Cato, Augustina M Delaney, Samantha M Olson, John F Nahabedian, Megan R Reynolds, Abbey M Jones, Varsha Neelam, Miguel Valencia-Prado and 12 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Birth defects research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 62% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Nicole M RothDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6279-5561
Kate R WoodworthDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Shana Godfred-CatoDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4106-0953
Augustina M DelaneyDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2627-7756
Samantha M OlsonDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0589-5766
John F NahabedianEagle Global Scientific, LLC, Alpharetta, Georgia, USA.
Megan R ReynoldsDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Abbey M JonesDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Varsha NeelamDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Miguel Valencia-PradoPuerto Rico Department of Health, San Juan, Puerto Rico, USA.
Camille Delgado-LópezPuerto Rico Department of Health, San Juan, Puerto Rico, USA.
Ellen H LeeNew York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, New York, USA.
Esther M EllisUS Virgin Islands Department of Health, Christiansted, US Virgin Islands, USA.
Heather Lake-BurgerFlorida Department of Health, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.
Julius L TonzelLouisiana Department of Health, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
Cathleen A HigginsMassachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ronna L ChanNorth Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Van T TongDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Suzanne M GilboaDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Janet D CraganDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Margaret A HoneinDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Cynthia A MooreDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4224-2692
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USPuerto Rico Department of Health · PREagle Mount · USFlorida Department of Health · USLouisiana State Department of Health and Hospitals · USMassachusetts Department of Public Health · USNC Department of Health and Human Services · USNew York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene · USUnited States Virgin Islands Department of Health · VI

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe US Zika Pregnancy and Infant Registry (USZPIR) monitors infants born to mothers with confirmed or possible Zika virus infection during pregnancy. The surveillance case definition for Zika-associated birth defects includes microcephaly based on head circumference (HC).

methodsWe assessed birth and follow-up data from infants with birth HC measurements <3rd percentile and birthweight ≥10th percentile to determine possible misclassification of microcephaly. We developed a schema informed by literature review and expert opinion to identify possible HC measurement inaccuracy using HC growth velocity and longitudinal HC measurements between 2 and 12 months of age. Two or more HC measurements were required for assessment. Inaccuracy in birth HC measurement was suspected if growth velocity was >3 cm/month in the first 3 months or HC was consistently >25th percentile during follow-up.

resultsOf 6,799 liveborn infants in USZPIR, 351 (5.2%) had Zika-associated birth defects, of which 111 had birth HC measurements <3rd percentile and birthweight ≥10th percentile. Of 84/111 infants with sufficient follow-up, 38/84 (45%) were classified as having possible inaccuracy of birth HC measurement, 19/84 (23%) had HC ≥3rd percentile on follow-up without meeting criteria for possible inaccuracy, and 27/84 (32%) had continued HC <3rd percentile. After excluding possible inaccuracies, the proportion of infants with Zika-associated birth defects including microcephaly decreased from 5.2% to 4.6%.

conclusionsAbout one-third of infants in USZPIR with Zika-associated birth defects had only microcephaly, but indications of possible measurement inaccuracy were common. Implementation of this schema in longitudinal studies can reduce misclassification of microcephaly.

Indexed as

MicrocephalyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousZika VirusZika Virus InfectionBirth WeightFemaleHumansInfantMalePregnancyRegistriesbirth defectscongenital Zika syndromemicrocephalypopulation surveillancepregnancyZika virus infection

Identifiers

PMID35332688
PMCPMC10391875
OpenAlexW4220906220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.