Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35332654›Full record

ArticleDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2022

Cardiovascular efficacy of liraglutide and semaglutide in individuals with diabetes and peripheral artery disease.

Subodh Verma, Mohammed Al-Omran, Lawrence A Leiter, C David Mazer, Søren Rasmussen, Hans A Saevereid, Maria Sejersten Ripa, Marc P Bonaca

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Guideline
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Peripheral artery disease.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Oral Semaglutide as an Opportunity for an Appropriate Therapeutic Switch in People with Type 2 Diabetes: A Delphi Consensus.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Epidemiology and Burden of Peripheral Artery Disease in People With Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Literature Review.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Subodh VermaSt. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4018-8533
Mohammed Al-OmranSt. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lawrence A LeiterSt. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
C David MazerSt. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2566-4308
Søren RasmussenNovo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark.
Hans A SaevereidNovo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark.
Maria Sejersten RipaNovo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark.
Marc P BonacaCPC Clinical Research, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
St. Michael's Hospital · CANovo Nordisk (Denmark) · DKUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate the cardiovascular (CV) efficacy of liraglutide and semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and peripheral artery disease (PAD). MATERIALS AND

methodsLEADER and SUSTAIN 6 trials investigated subcutaneous liraglutide (≤1.8 mg/day) and semaglutide (0.5 or 1.0 mg/week), respectively, versus placebo in patients with T2D and high CV risk (median follow-up: 3.8 and 2.1 years, respectively). The primary outcome was a composite of CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction or non-fatal stroke (major adverse CV event [MACE]) according to the presence of PAD at baseline.

resultsOverall, 1184/9340 (12.7%) patients in LEADER and 460/3297 (14.0%) in SUSTAIN 6 had PAD at baseline. Patients with PAD were at an ~35% increased risk of MACE versus those without (LEADER: hazard ratio [HR] 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-1.58; SUSTAIN 6: HR 1.33, 95% CI 0.94-1.83). The effects of both therapies on MACE were consistently beneficial in patients with PAD (liraglutide: HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.58-1.01; semaglutide: 0.61, 0.33-1.13) and without (liraglutide: HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.79-1.00; semaglutide: HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.58-1.01; P

conclusionBoth liraglutide and semaglutide reduce MACE with consistent CV efficacy regardless of PAD status.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Peripheral Arterial DiseaseGlucagon-Like PeptidesHumansHypoglycemic AgentsLiraglutideSemaglutideGlucagon-Like PeptidesHypoglycemic AgentsLiraglutideSemaglutidecardiovascular diseaseGLP-1macrovascular diseaseperipheral artery diseasereceptor agoniststype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID35332654
PMCPMC9325529
OpenAlexW4220949041

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.