Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35332627›Full record

Observational studyPhysiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy2022

Recovery and prediction of physical function 1 year following hip fracture.

Monica Beckmann, Vigdis Bruun-Olsen, Are Hugo Pripp, Astrid Bergland, Toby Smith, Kristi Elisabeth Heiberg

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Recovery and prediction of physical function 1 year following hip fracture.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2022
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Monica BeckmannDepartment of Medical Research, Baerum Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5750-2421
Vigdis Bruun-OlsenDepartment of Medical Research, Baerum Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen, Norway.
Are Hugo PrippFaculty of Health Science, OsloMet-Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Astrid BerglandFaculty of Health Science, OsloMet-Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4349-8200
Toby SmithFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Kristi Elisabeth HeibergDepartment of Medical Research, Baerum Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen, Norway.
OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University · NOOslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of East Anglia · GBUniversity of Oslo · NOVestre Viken Hospital Trust · NO

Funding

Vestre Viken HF
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the recovery of physical function, health related quality of life (HRQoL), and pain for people following hip fracture for the initial 12 months, and to examine whether postoperative outcome measures of physical function, HRQoL, and pain can predict physical function at 3 and 12 months.

designA prospective single-center observational study, as part of the HIPFRAC trial. SETTINGS: One hospital with two associated municipalities in Norway. SUBJECTS: 207 participants with hip fracture included in the study (140 participants transferred to a short-term nursing home placement and 67 transferred directly home at discharge from hospital).

methodOutcome measures were Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), Timed Up & Go (TUG), Stair climbing test (SC), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain at rest and in activity, and EQ-5D-5L index and health score. Data were analysed by repeated measures of variance and multivariate regression analyses.

resultsThere were statistically significant improvements in physical function (SPPB total score and TUG), NRS-pain in activity, and HRQoL (EQ-5D-5L) from hospital discharge to 3-month follow-up for the whole cohort and the two groups (p < 0.001). However, the largest improvements occurred within the first 3 months. Further statistically significant improvements occurred between 3 and 12 months (p < 0.05). The strongest predictors of physical function at 3 and 12 months post-fracture were physical function (SPPB) at hospital discharge and pre-fracture requirement of a walking aid.

conclusionThe recovery of physical function, HRQoL, and pain in participants after hip fracture indicates gradual improvements during the initial 12-month follow-up, with the largest improvements within the first 3 months.

Indexed as

Hip FracturesQuality of LifeHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CarePainProspective StudiesRecovery of Functionelderlyhip fracturepredictionrecovery

Identifiers

PMID35332627
PMCPMC9541337
OpenAlexW4220740741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.