Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35332616›Full record

ArticleTropical medicine & international health : TM & IH2022

Values and preferences of the general population in Indonesia in relation to rapid COVID-19 antigen self-tests: A cross-sectional survey.

Caroline Thomas, Sonjelle Shilton, Catherine Thomas, Deepshikha Batheja, Srishti Goel, Claudius Mone Iye, Elena Ivanova, Guillermo Z Martínez-Pérez

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Caroline ThomasPeduli Hati Bangsa, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Sonjelle ShiltonFIND, the global alliance for diagnostics, Geneva, Switzerland.
Catherine ThomasPeduli Hati Bangsa, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Deepshikha BathejaCentre for Disease Dynamics, Economics and Policy, New Delhi, India.
Srishti GoelCentre for Disease Dynamics, Economics and Policy, New Delhi, India.
Claudius Mone IyePeduli Hati Bangsa, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Elena IvanovaFIND, the global alliance for diagnostics, Geneva, Switzerland.
Guillermo Z Martínez-PérezFIND, the global alliance for diagnostics, Geneva, Switzerland.
Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics · CHUniversitas Nusa Bangsa · IDCenter for Disease Dynamics, Economics and Policy · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesHome diagnostics are essential to assist members of the general population become active agents of case detection. In Indonesia, a country with an over-burdened healthcare system, individuals could use rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests to self-detect COVID-19. To assess the general population's values and attitudes towards SARS-CoV-2 self-testing, a survey was conducted in mid-2021 in Jakarta and the provinces of Banten and North Sulawesi.

methodsThis was a quantitative survey that approached respondents in >600 randomly selected street-points in the three study geographies in July-August 2021. A 35-item questionnaire was used to collect data on key variables, such as likelihood to use a SARS-CoV-2 self-test, willingness to pay for a self-test device, and likely actions following a positive self-test result. Bivariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed.

resultsOf 630 respondents (318 were female), 15.53% knew about COVID-19 self-testing, while 62.70% agreed with the idea of people being able to self-test at home, unassisted, for COVID-19. If self-tests were available in Indonesia, >60% of respondents would use them if they felt it necessary and would undertake regular self-testing for example weekly if recommended. Upon receiving a positive self-test result, most respondents would communicate it (86.03%), request post-test counselling (80.79%), self-isolate (97.46%), and/or warn their close contacts (90.48%).

conclusionsThe use of rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection tests for self-testing appears acceptable to a majority of the Indonesian public, to learn whether they have COVID-19. Self-testing should be prioritised to complement to an over-burdened healthcare system by helping the public, asymptomatic individuals included, become agents of change in epidemiological surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in their communities.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 TestingCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIndonesiaMaleSARS-CoV-2COVID-19home diagnosticsIndonesiaSARS-CoV-2 testingself-testingsurvey

Identifiers

PMID35332616
PMCPMC9115524
OpenAlexW4229013175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.