Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35332582›Full record

ArticleMovement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society2022

Sensitivity to Change and Patient-Centricity of the Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale Items: A Data-Driven Analysis.

Florian Krismer, Klaus Seppi, Linus Jönsson, Daniel Oudin Åström, Anna-Karin Berger, Jacob Simonsen, Mark Forrest Gordon, Gregor K Wenning, Werner Poewe, European Multiple System Atrophy Study Group Natural History Study Investigators and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Multiple system atrophy: cure and care.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026
    Review
  2. Multiple System Atrophy Combined Outcome Assessment (MuSyCA): process, format, and validation plan.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Recent Advances in Clinical Trials in Multiple System Atrophy.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale: Status, Critique, and Recommendations.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Florian KrismerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4493-5073
Klaus SeppiDepartment of Neurology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-6503-1455
Linus JönssonSection for Neurogeriatrics, Department for Neurobiology, Care and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Daniel Oudin ÅströmH. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark.
Anna-Karin BergerH. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark.
Jacob SimonsenH. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark.
Mark Forrest GordonTeva Pharmaceuticals, West Chester, Pennsylvania, USA.
Gregor K WenningDepartment of Neurology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Werner PoeweDepartment of Neurology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
European Multiple System Atrophy Study Group Natural History Study Investigators
Rasagiline-for-Multiple System Atrophy Investigators
Innsbruck Medical University · ATLundbeck (Denmark) · DKTeva Pharmaceuticals (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS) is a commonly used semiquantitative rating scale to assess symptoms and measure disease progression in multiple system atrophy (MSA). However, it is currently incompletely understood which UMSARS items are the most sensitive to change and most relevant to the patient.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to assess sensitivity to change and patient-centricity of single UMSARS items.

methodsData were taken from the European Multiple System Atrophy Study Group Natural History Study and the Rasagiline for Multiple System Atrophy trial. Sensitivity of change of an item of the UMSARS was assessed by calculation of a sensitivity-to-change ratio using its mean slope of progression divided by the standard deviation of the slope when modeling its progression over time. Patient-centricity was assessed through correlation of UMSARS items with quality-of-life measures.

resultsProgression rates above the mean in at least one of the two studies examined here were seen for seven items of UMSARS I and 11 items of UMSARS II. These items related to key motor functions such as swallowing, speech, handwriting, cutting food, hygiene, and dressing or walking, whereas items related to autonomic dysfunction were generally less sensitive to change in either data set. More UMSARS I items were identified as patient-centric compared with UMSARS II items, and items most strongly impacting patients' quality of life were those affecting verbal communication skills, personal hygiene, and walking.

conclusionThe present results illustrate the potential to optimize the UMSARS to enhance sensitivity to change and patient centricity. © 2022 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Indexed as

Autonomic Nervous System DiseasesMultiple System AtrophyHumansQuality of Lifeclinical outcome assessmentmultiple system atrophypatient-centricityUnified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale

Identifiers

PMID35332582
PMCPMC9543676
OpenAlexW4221023767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.