Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35332517›Full record

ArticleActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2022

The Karolinska NeuroCOVID study protocol: Neurocognitive impairment, biomarkers and advanced imaging in critical care survivors.

David W Nelson, Tobias Granberg, Pia Andersen, Elias Jokhadar, Jessica Kåhlin, Anna Granström, Helena Hallinder, Anna Schening, Charlotta Thunborg, Håkan Walles and 11 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

David W NelsonDeptartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Tobias GranbergDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Pia AndersenDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Clinical Geriatrics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Elias JokhadarDeptartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jessica KåhlinDeptartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anna GranströmFunction Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care (PMI), Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden.
Helena HallinderDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Clinical Geriatrics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anna ScheningFunction Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care (PMI), Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden.
Charlotta ThunborgDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Clinical Geriatrics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Håkan WallesTheme Inflammation and Aging, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Göran HagmanTheme Inflammation and Aging, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Roya Shams-LatifiDepartment of Neuroradiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jimmy YuDepartment of Radiology Solna, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sven PeterssonDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Antonios TzortzakakisDepartment of Neuroradiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Nicholas LevakDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Clinical Geriatrics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Malin AspöDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Clinical Geriatrics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Fredrik PiehlDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Henrik ZetterbergDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.
Miia KivipeltoDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Clinical Geriatrics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lars I ErikssonDeptartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska University Hospital · SEKarolinska Institutet · SEImperial College London · GBMälardalen University · SEUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis is the study plan of the Karolinska NeuroCOVID study, a study of neurocognitive impairment after severe COVID-19, relating post-intensive care unit (ICU) cognitive and neurological deficits to biofluid markers and MRI. The COVID-19 pandemic has posed enormous health challenges to individuals and health-care systems worldwide. An emerging feature of severe COVID-19 is that of temporary and extended neurocognitive impairment, exhibiting a myriad of symptoms and signs. The causes of this symptomatology have not yet been fully elucidated.

methodsIn this study, we aim to investigate patients treated for severe COVID-19 in the ICU, as to describe and relate serum-, plasma- and cerebrospinal fluid-borne molecular and cellular biomarkers of immune activity, coagulopathy, cerebral damage, neuronal inflammation, and degeneration, to the temporal development of structural and functional changes within the brain as evident by serial MRI and extensive cognitive assessments at 3-12 months after ICU discharge.

resultsTo date, we have performed 51 3-month follow-up MRIs in the ICU survivors. Of these, two patients (~4%) have had incidental findings on brain MRI findings requiring activation of the Incidental Findings Management Plan. Furthermore, the neuropsychological and neurological examinations have so far revealed varying and mixed patterns. Several patients expressed cognitive and/or mental concerns and fatigue, complaints closely related to brain fog.

conclusionThe study goal is to gain a better understanding of the pathological mechanisms and neurological consequences of this new disease, with a special emphasis on neurodegenerative and neuroinflammatory processes, in order to identify targets of intervention and rehabilitation.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsBiomarkersCritical CareHumansSurvivorsBiomarkersbiomarkersbrain injuryCOVID-19critical caremagnetic resonance imagingneurocognitive disorderspatient outcome assessment

Identifiers

PMID35332517
PMCPMC9111098
OpenAlexW4221100424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.