Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35332443›Full record

ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2022

Plant- and Animal-Based Protein-Rich Foods and Cardiovascular Health.

Yu Wang, Erica R Hill, Wayne W Campbell, Lauren E O'Connor

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yu WangDepartment of Nutrition Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8146-0559
Erica R HillDepartment of Nutrition Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9294-1056
Wayne W CampbellDepartment of Nutrition Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7847-7242
Lauren E O'ConnorDivision of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 4E570, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA. leoconnor24@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4142-5756
Purdue University West Lafayette · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTo summarize recent evidence from randomized controlled feeding trials (RCTs) on the effects of consuming plant- and animal-based protein-rich foods on cardiovascular health of adults. RECENT

findingsResults from meta-analyses of RCTs exemplify the importance of considering relative effects of protein-rich foods, i.e., when intake of one food increases, intake of another food likely decreases. Results from short-term RCTs showed that overall diet quality is more influential for improving cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors than intake of a single protein-rich food, e.g., red meat. Yet, assessing long-term CVD risk associated with intake of a single protein-rich food as part of a dietary pattern is methodologically challenging. While accumulating evidence suggests gut microbiota as a potential mediator for such effects, current knowledge is preliminary and restricts causal or functional inferences. A variety of protein-rich foods, both plant- and animal-based, should be consumed as part of nutrient-dense dietary patterns to meet nutrient needs and improve cardiovascular health for adults.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesDietAnimalsHumansNutrientsNutrientsAnimal and plant proteinCardiovascular disease riskDietary guidanceDietary patternsDiet qualityFood processing

Identifiers

PMID35332443
OpenAlexW4220910868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.