ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2022
Update on Plant-Based Diets and Cardiometabolic Risk.
Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Plant-Based Food: From Nutritional Value to Health Benefits: 2nd Edition.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Association of plant-based food intake in daily diets and hypertension in older adults: a cohort study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Plant-Based Diets and Metabolic Syndrome Components: The Questions That Still Need to Be Answered-A Narrative Review.Nutrients · 2024Review
- The Association between Plant-Based Diets and Dietary Patterns with Cardiometabolic Risk in a Sample of Commercial Taxi Drivers in South Africa.Nutrients · 2023Article
- Metabolomics of Dietary Intake of Total, Animal, and Plant Protein: Results from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study.Current developments in nutrition · 2023Article
- Review
- Plant-based diet for obesity treatment.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe number of published studies on the health effects of plant-based diets has increased dramatically in the last decade. The purpose of this narrative review is to update the most recent evidence from large prospective cohort studies and meta-analyses on the effects of plant-based dietary patterns on cardiovascular outcomes and risk factors and total mortality. RECENT
findingsMost new data from large prospective cohort studies carried out in the USA, Europe, and Asia continue to show inverse associations between plant-based diets and the incidence of ischemic heart disease and stroke, while less data exist for heart failure incidence. New analyses suggest that only some components of plant-based diets are associated with cardiovascular benefit. Recent meta-analyses show inverse associations between plant-protein intake and all-cause mortality, although heterogeneity exists, and small mortality risks from some animal proteins, notably processed meats. New studies continue to demonstrate small but favorable effects of plant-based diets on traditional risk factors and suggest other emerging mechanisms by which plant-based diets exert cardiovascular benefits. The recommendation to consume a plant-based diet to reduce cardiovascular risk remains an evidence-based strategy based on observational studies. New data highlight the importance of ensuring that these diets are nutrient-rich and low in plant foods associated with signals of harm. For this reason, assessment of diet quality is important even in patients who report adherence to plant-based diets. Large randomized trials with hard cardiovascular endpoints might strengthen this evidence-base, but feasibility is limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35332441What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.