Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35332409›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2022

How to improve O-RADS MRI score for rating adnexal masses with cystic component?

Victoria Assouline, Yohann Dabi, Aurélie Jalaguier-Coudray, Sanja Stojanovic, Ingrid Millet, Caroline Reinhold, Marc Bazot, Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara, EURAD study group

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (O-RADS MRI): Genesis and Future Directions.Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Victoria AssoulineService de radiologie, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne Université, APHP, 75020, Paris, France. victoria_assouline@hotmail.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1301-9627
Yohann DabiService de radiologie, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne Université, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, 75020, Paris, France.
Aurélie Jalaguier-CoudrayInstitut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France.
Sanja StojanovicCentre for Radiology, Clinical Centre of Vojvodina, Medical Faculty, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Ingrid MilletDepartment of Radiology, Lapeyronie Hospital, Montpellier, France.
Caroline ReinholdDepartment of Medical Imaging, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Marc BazotService de radiologie, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne Université, APHP, 75020, Paris, France.
Isabelle Thomassin-NaggaraService de radiologie, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne Université, APHP, 75020, Paris, France.
EURAD study group
Sorbonne Université · FRInserm · FRInstitut Paoli-Calmettes · FRMcGill University Health Centre · CAUniversity of Novi Sad · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo test the performance of the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting Data System (O-RADS) MRI in characterizing adnexal masses with cystic components and to test new specific MRI features related to cystic components to improve the ability of the O-RADS MRI score to stratify lesions according to their risk of malignancy.

methodsThe EURopean ADnexal study (EURAD) database was retrospectively queried to identify adnexal masses with a cystic component. One junior and 13 radiologists independently reviewed cases blinded to the pathological diagnosis. For each lesion, the size of the whole lesion, morphological appearance, number of loculi, presence of a thickened wall, thickened septae, signal intensity of the cystic components on T1-weighted/T2-weighted/diffusion weighted, mean value of the apparent diffusion coefficient, and O-RADS MRI score were reported. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine significant features to predict malignancy.

resultsThe final cohort consisted of 585 patients with 779 pelvic masses who underwent pelvic MRI to characterize an adnexal mass(es). Histology served as the standard of reference. The diagnostic performance of the O-RADS MRI score was 0.944,

conclusionCystic component analysis may improve the diagnosis performance of the O-RADS MRI score in adnexal cystic masses. KEY POINTS: • O-RADS MRI score combined with specific cystic features (area under the receiving operating curve, AUROC = 0.958) improves the diagnostic performance of the O-RADS MRI score (AUROC = 0.944) for predicting malignancy in this cohort. • Cystic features that improve the prediction of malignancy are ADC mean > 1.69 (OR = 7); number of loculi ≥ 3 (OR = 5.16); lesion size > 75 mm (OR = 4.40); the presence of a thick wall (OR = 3.59); a high T2-weighted signal intensity score 4 or 5 (OR = 3.30); a low T1-weighted signal intensity score 1, 2, or 3 (OR = 3.45); and a low diffusion-weighted signal intensity (OR = 2.12). • An adnexal lesion with a cystic component rated O-RADS MRI score 4 and an ADC value of the cystic component < 1.69 associated with a low diffusion-weighted signal, has virtually a 0% risk of malignancy.

Indexed as

Adnexal DiseasesAdnexa UteriDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityAdnexal diseaseMagnetic resonance imagingNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID35332409
OpenAlexW4220922564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.