Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35332398›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2022

Extramural venous invasion (EMVI) revisited: a detailed analysis of various characteristics of EMVI and their role as a predictive imaging biomarker in the neoadjuvant treatment response in rectal cancer.

Emre Altinmakas, Hakan Dogan, Orhun Cig Taskin, Emre Ozoran, Dursun Bugra, Volkan Adsay, Emre Balik, Bengi Gurses

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Emre AltinmakasDepartment of Radiology, Koç University School of Medicine, 34010, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0727-9230
Hakan DoganDepartment of Radiology, Koç University School of Medicine, 34010, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2613-0228
Orhun Cig TaskinDepartment of Pathology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6668-3006
Emre OzoranDepartment of General Surgery, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9371-6811
Dursun BugraDepartment of General Surgery, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0316-6818
Volkan AdsayDepartment of Pathology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1308-3701
Emre BalikDepartment of General Surgery, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5751-1133
Bengi GursesDepartment of Radiology, Koç University School of Medicine, 34010, Istanbul, Turkey. bgurses@kuh.ku.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2482-3445
Koç University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess whether size, diameter, and large vein involvement of MR-detected extramural venous invasion (MR-EMVI) have an impact on neoadjuvant therapy response in rectal adenocarcinoma.

methods57 patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma scanned with MRI before and after neoadjuvant therapy were included. Two abdominal radiologists evaluated the images with special emphasis on EMVI, on initial staging and after neoadjuvant treatment. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI for detection of rest EMVI were determined. The association of various MR-EMVI characteristics including number, size, and main vein involvement with treatment response was investigated. In subjects with discordance of radiology and pathology, elastin stain was performed, and images and slides were re-evaluated on site with a multidisciplinary approach.

resultsAt initial evaluation, 17 patients were MR-EMVI negative (29.8%) and 40 were MR-EMVI positive (70.2%). Complete/near-complete responders had less number (mean 1.45) and smaller diameter of MR-EMVI (mean 1.8 mm), when compared with partial responders (2.54 and 3.3 mm; p < 0.005). The sensitivity of MRI for rest EMVI detection was high, specificity was moderate, and in one patient elastin stain changed the final decision. In five patients with rest MR-EMVI positivity, carcinoma histopathologically had a distinctive serpiginous perivascular spread, growing along the track of vascular bundle, although it did not appear in intravascular spaces.

conclusionThis study demonstrates that not only the presence, but also size and number of EMVI that may be significant clinically and thus these parameters also ought to be incorporated to the MRI evaluation and prognostication of treatment response. From pathology perspective, tumors growing alongside major vessels may also reflect EMVI even if they are not demonstrably "intravascular."

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaRectal NeoplasmsBiomarkersElastinHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm InvasivenessRare DiseasesRetrospective StudiesBiomarkersElastinCancerEMVIMRIRectum

Identifiers

PMID35332398
OpenAlexW4220918627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.