ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2022
A retrospective analysis using deep-learning models for prediction of survival outcome and benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II/III colorectal cancer.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating histopathology and immune marker analysis for machine learning-based colorectal cancer prognostics.Diagnostic pathology · 2026Article
- Physical activity intensities and depression in colorectal cancer: interoceptive accuracy as a mediator and mindfulness as a moderator.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- Construction of a novel prediction model based on albumin-hemoglobin score and serum microRNA-497-5p for prognosis of patients with stage II-III colorectal cancer.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- Exploring Machine Learning Approaches for Decision Support in Neoadjuvant Therapy of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.Oncology research · 2026Article
- Age-related differences in adjuvant chemotherapy use and outcomes in stage II colon cancer: a retrospective cohort study.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Extramural venous invasion in gastric cancer: 9.4T magnetic resonance imaging assessment and circular RNA functional analysis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Deep learning in cancer genomics and histopathology.Genome medicine · 2024Review
- Colorectal cancer risk stratification on histological slides based on survival curves predicted by deep learning.NPJ precision oncology · 2023Article
- Deep Learning Techniques with Genomic Data in Cancer Prognosis: A Comprehensive Review of the 2021-2023 Literature.Biology · 2023Article
- Computer-aided detection and prognosis of colorectal cancer on whole slide images using dual resolution deep learning.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Optimization of deep learning models for the prediction of gene mutations using unsupervised clustering.The journal of pathology. Clinical research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeMost of Stage II/III colorectal cancer (CRC) patients can be cured by surgery alone, and only certain CRC patients benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Risk stratification based on deep-learning from haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) images has been postulated as a potential predictive biomarker for benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. However, very limited success has been achieved in using biomarkers, including deep-learning-based markers, to facilitate the decision for adjuvant chemotherapy despite recent advances of artificial intelligence.
methodsWe trained and internally validated CRCNet using 780 Stage II/III CRC patients from Molecular and Cellular Oncology. Independent external validation of the model was performed using 337 Stage II/III CRC patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA).
resultsCRCNet stratified the patients into high, medium, and low-risk subgroups. Multivariate Cox regression analyses confirmed that CRCNet risk groups are statistically significant after adjusting for existing risk factors. The high-risk subgroup significantly benefits from adjuvant chemotherapy. A hazard ratio (chemo-treated vs untreated) of 0.2 (95% Confidence Interval (CI), 0.05-0.65; P = 0.009) and 0.6 (95% CI 0.42-0.98; P = 0.038) are observed in the TCGA and MCO Fluorouracil-treated patients, respectively. Conversely, no significant benefit from chemotherapy is observed in the low- and medium-risk groups (P = 0.2-1).
conclusionThe retrospective analysis provides further evidence that H&E image-based biomarkers may potentially be of great use in delivering treatments following surgery for Stage II/III CRC, improving patient survival, and avoiding unnecessary treatment and associated toxicity, and warrants further validation on other datasets and prospective confirmation in clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.