Observational studyArchives of women's mental health2022
Patterns of peripartum depression screening and detection in a large, multi-site, integrated healthcare system.
Observational study in Archives of women's mental health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proposing a two-stage screening approach to distinguish between transient and enduring postnatal depressive symptoms: A prospective cohort study.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2025Article
- Rapid-Acting Treatments for Perinatal Depression: Clinical Landscapes and Future Horizons.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Review
- Preconception paternal mental health history as predictor of antenatal depression in pregnant women.Annals of general psychiatry · 2025Article
- Integrating perinatal mental health into primary health care in Belize.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2025Article
- Risk Factors for Postpartum Depression and Severe Distress among Mothers of Very Preterm Infants at NICU Discharge.American journal of perinatology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine peripartum depression (PD) screening patterns within and across the prenatal and postpartum periods and assess the incidence of new positive screens during standard screening protocol timepoints to inform practice, particularly when limited screenings can be conducted.This is a retrospective observational study of women screened for PD through a large, integrated health system using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) within their obstetrics and pediatric practices. Pregnancies with an EPDS score for at least one obstetric and one pediatric appointment between November 2016 and October 2019 were included (n = 3240). The data were analyzed using chi-squared test, Student's t-test, and binary logistic regression analyses. An EPDS score of 10 or higher was considered a positive screen.The positive screening rate for this cohort was 18.5%, with a prenatal positive rate of 9.9% and a postpartum positive rate of 8.6%. Single relationship status showed a higher rate of PD overall. Two thirds of women were not screened until their third trimester, resulting in delayed detection for an estimated 28% of women who ultimately screened positive. Few new positive screens (1.3%) were detected after 9 weeks postpartum in women who had completed all recommended prior screens.Obstetric providers should screen for PD as early in pregnancy as possible and continue to screen as often as feasible regardless of previous negative EPDS scores. Prioritizing screening more often in pregnancy and before 9 weeks postpartum is optimal to avoid delays in detection and intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35332376What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.