Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35332376›Full record

Observational studyArchives of women's mental health2022

Patterns of peripartum depression screening and detection in a large, multi-site, integrated healthcare system.

Amanda Koire, Bethanie S Van Horne, Yen H Nong, Cary M Cain, Christopher S Greeley, Lucy Puryear

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Archives of women's mental health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Rapid-Acting Treatments for Perinatal Depression: Clinical Landscapes and Future Horizons.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Integrating perinatal mental health into primary health care in Belize.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amanda KoireDepartment of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Bethanie S Van HorneDepartment of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, 6621 Fannin Street, MC A2275, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. bethanie.vanhorne@bcm.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4820-4809
Yen H NongDepartment of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, 6621 Fannin Street, MC A2275, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Cary M CainDepartment of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, 6621 Fannin Street, MC A2275, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Christopher S GreeleyDepartment of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, 6621 Fannin Street, MC A2275, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Lucy PuryearObstetrics and Gynecology, Menninger Department of Psychiatry, Baylor College of Medicine, 6651 Main Street, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine peripartum depression (PD) screening patterns within and across the prenatal and postpartum periods and assess the incidence of new positive screens during standard screening protocol timepoints to inform practice, particularly when limited screenings can be conducted.This is a retrospective observational study of women screened for PD through a large, integrated health system using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) within their obstetrics and pediatric practices. Pregnancies with an EPDS score for at least one obstetric and one pediatric appointment between November 2016 and October 2019 were included (n = 3240). The data were analyzed using chi-squared test, Student's t-test, and binary logistic regression analyses. An EPDS score of 10 or higher was considered a positive screen.The positive screening rate for this cohort was 18.5%, with a prenatal positive rate of 9.9% and a postpartum positive rate of 8.6%. Single relationship status showed a higher rate of PD overall. Two thirds of women were not screened until their third trimester, resulting in delayed detection for an estimated 28% of women who ultimately screened positive. Few new positive screens (1.3%) were detected after 9 weeks postpartum in women who had completed all recommended prior screens.Obstetric providers should screen for PD as early in pregnancy as possible and continue to screen as often as feasible regardless of previous negative EPDS scores. Prioritizing screening more often in pregnancy and before 9 weeks postpartum is optimal to avoid delays in detection and intervention.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedDepression, PostpartumChildDepressionFemaleHumansMass ScreeningPeripartum PeriodPostpartum PeriodPregnancyPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesAntenatal depressionMaternal mental healthPostpartum depressionPrenatal depression

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.