ArticleNature chemical biology2022
Systematic identification of biomarker-driven drug combinations to overcome resistance.
Article in Nature chemical biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Functional genomics and proteomics identify Folate Carrier SLC19A1 as a predictor of pralatrexate sensitivity in diverse T-cell lymphoma models.Molecular cancer therapeutics · 2026Article
- Article
- Integrating functional genomics and proteomics identifies Folate Carrier SLC19A1 as a predictor of pralatrexate sensitivity in T-cell lymphoma.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Role of intratumoral heterogeneity in metastatic progression and drug resistance.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Computational drug repurposing: approaches, evaluation of in silico resources and case studies.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2025Review
- SynergyX: a multi-modality mutual attention network for interpretable drug synergy prediction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Article
- Predicting drug response from single-cell expression profiles of tumours.BMC medicine · 2023Article
- Review
- Optimization of Cas12a for multiplexed genome-scale transcriptional activation.Cell genomics · 2023Article
- Genomic screening methodology not requiring barcoding: Single nucleotide polymorphism-based, mixed-cell screening (SMICS).Genomics · 2023Article
- Evolution-Informed Strategies for Combating Drug Resistance in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Combinatorial Therapy of Cancer: Possible Advantages of Involving Modulators of Ionic Mechanisms.Cancers · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ability to understand and predict variable responses to therapeutic agents may improve outcomes in patients with cancer. We hypothesized that the basal gene-transcription state of cancer cell lines, coupled with cell viability profiles of small molecules, might be leveraged to nominate specific mechanisms of intrinsic resistance and to predict drug combinations that overcome resistance. We analyzed 564,424 sensitivity profiles to identify candidate gene-compound pairs, and validated nine such relationships. We determined the mechanism of a novel relationship, in which expression of the serine hydrolase enzymes monoacylglycerol lipase (MGLL) or carboxylesterase 1 (CES1) confers resistance to the histone lysine demethylase inhibitor GSK-J4 by direct enzymatic modification. Insensitive cell lines could be sensitized to GSK-J4 by inhibition or gene knockout. These analytical and mechanistic studies highlight the potential of integrating gene-expression features with small-molecule response to identify patient populations that are likely to benefit from treatment, to nominate rational candidates for combinations and to provide insights into mechanisms of action.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.