ArticleInternational journal of impotence research2023
Analysis of quality information provided by "Dr. YouTube
Article in International journal of impotence research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Characteristics and Popularity of Videos of Abusive Head Trauma Prevention: Systematic Appraisal.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Oncosexology: A Narrative Review on Sexual Health and Quality of Life in Cancer Patients.Cancer medicine · 2026Review
- Analysis of the YouTube videos on intracavernosal injection in terms of their comprehensiveness, reliability and quality.International journal of impotence research · 2026Article
- YouTube and TikTok as patient resources: assessment of online video content on extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.Central European journal of urology · 2026Article
- The quality and reliability of short videos about myocardial infarction on TikTok: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Impacts of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Misinformation in Digital Spaces on Human Rights Protection and Promotion: Scoping Review.JMIR infodemiology · 2025Article
- Is YouTube™ a Reliable Source of Information for the Current Use of HIPEC in the Treatment of Ovarian Cancer?Cancers · 2025Review
- Analyzing Turkish-Language HPV Vaccination Videos on YouTube: Assessing Content Quality and Educational Value.Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology · 2025Article
- Social Media and Men's Health: Separating Science from Speculation in Andrology.Basic and clinical andrology · 2025Review
- Post-finasteride syndrome - a true clinical entity?International journal of impotence research · 2025Review
- Article
- Quality of information in Youtube videos on disorder of sexual development.International journal of impotence research · 2024Article
- Sexual Outcomes after Conservative Management for Patients with Localized Penile Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Article
- Double J Stents and Reno-Ureteral Lithiasis: Dynamic Changes in Management during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Mental Health of Prostate Cancer Patients: Content Review on YouTubeInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Social Media Content on Immunology: Is an Assessment by the Scientific Community Required?Vaccines · 2023Article
- Immunotherapy for Urological Tumors on YouTubeVaccines · 2022Article
- Quality and accuracy of gastric cancer related videos in social media videos platforms.BMC public health · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of the current study was to evaluate the quality of the information provided in YouTube
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.