Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35332195›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Comparisons of plasma and fecal pharmacokinetics of danofloxacin and enrofloxacin in healthy and Mannheimia haemolytica infected calves.

Ashenafi Feyisa Beyi, Jonathan P Mochel, Géraldine Magnin, Tyler Hawbecker, Clare Slagel, Grant Dewell, Renee Dewell, Orhan Sahin, Johann F Coetzee, Qijing Zhang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ashenafi Feyisa BeyiDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology and Preventative Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
Jonathan P MochelDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
Géraldine MagninDepartment of Anatomy and Physiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66502, USA.
Tyler HawbeckerCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
Clare SlagelCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
Grant DewellDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
Renee DewellCenter for Food Security/Public Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
Orhan SahinDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
Johann F CoetzeeDepartment of Anatomy and Physiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66502, USA.
Qijing ZhangDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology and Preventative Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
Paul J PlummerDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology and Preventative Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA. pplummer@iastate.edu.
Iowa State University · USKansas State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Danofloxacin and enrofloxacin are fluoroquinolones (FQs) used to treat and control bovine respiratory disease (BRD) complex. While low toxicity, high bactericidal activity, and availability in single and multiple dosing regimens make them preferable, the increasing incidence of FQ-resistance in foodborne pathogens and effects on gut microbiota necessitate evaluating their pharmacokinetics (PKs). The objective of this study was to determine the exposure level of gut microbiota to subcutaneously administered FQs and compare their PKs between plasma and feces in healthy and Mannheimia haemolytica infected calves. A single dose of danofloxacin (8 mg/kg), low dose (7.5 mg/kg), or high dose (12.5 mg/kg) of enrofloxacin was administered to calves. Blood and feces were collected from calves under experimental conditions over 48 h, and FQ concentrations were measured using Ultra High-Pressure Liquid Chromatography. While moderate BRD signs were exhibited in most calves in the infected cohorts, the plasma PKs were similar between healthy and sick calves. However, the fecal danofloxacin concentration was lower in the BRD group (area under concentration-time curve [AUC

Indexed as

Bovine Respiratory Disease ComplexMannheimia haemolyticaAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCattleEnrofloxacinFecesFluoroquinolonesAnti-Bacterial AgentsdanofloxacinEnrofloxacinFluoroquinolones

Identifiers

PMID35332195
PMCPMC8948211
OpenAlexW4221020893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.