Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35332166›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

The architecture of assisted colonisation in sea turtles: building new populations in a biodiversity crisis.

Anna Barbanti, Janice M Blumenthal, Annette C Broderick, Brendan J Godley, Alejandro Prat-Varela, Maria Turmo, Marta Pascual, Carlos Carreras

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anna BarbantiDepartment of Genetics, Microbiology and Statistics and IRBio, Universitat de Barcelona, Av. Diagonal 643, 08028, Barcelona, Spain.
Janice M BlumenthalDepartment of Environment, PO Box 10202, Grand Cayman, KY1-1002, Cayman Islands.
Annette C BroderickCentre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn, TR10 9FE, UK.
Brendan J GodleyCentre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn, TR10 9FE, UK.
Alejandro Prat-VarelaDepartment of Environment, PO Box 10202, Grand Cayman, KY1-1002, Cayman Islands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4409-6342
Maria TurmoDepartment of Genetics, Microbiology and Statistics and IRBio, Universitat de Barcelona, Av. Diagonal 643, 08028, Barcelona, Spain.
Marta PascualDepartment of Genetics, Microbiology and Statistics and IRBio, Universitat de Barcelona, Av. Diagonal 643, 08028, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6189-0612
Carlos CarrerasDepartment of Genetics, Microbiology and Statistics and IRBio, Universitat de Barcelona, Av. Diagonal 643, 08028, Barcelona, Spain. carreras@ub.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2478-6445

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to changing environmental conditions, many species will have to migrate or occupy new suitable areas to avoid potential extinction in the current biodiversity crisis. Long-lived animals are especially vulnerable and ex-situ conservation actions can provide solutions through assisted colonisations. However, there is little empirical evidence on the process of founding new populations for such species or the feasibility of assisted colonisations as a viable conservation measure. Here, we combined genetics with reproductive data to study the rise of two wild populations of green turtles (Chelonia mydas) in the Cayman Islands as a possible outcome of a reintroduction program started 50 years ago. We show that both populations are highly related to the captive population but rapidly diverged due to genetic drift. Individuals from the reintroduced populations showed high levels of nest fidelity, within and across nesting seasons, indicating that philopatry may help reinforce the success of new populations. Additionally, we show that reintroduction from captive populations has not undermined the reproductive fitness of first generation individuals. Sea turtle reintroduction programs can, therefore, establish new populations but require scientific evaluation of costs and benefits and should be monitored over time to ensure viability in the long-term.

Indexed as

TurtlesAnimalsBiodiversityNesting BehaviorReproductionSeasons

Identifiers

PMID35332166
PMCPMC8948361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.