Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35332137›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Automated multilabel diagnosis on electrocardiographic images and signals.

Veer Sangha, Bobak J Mortazavi, Adrian D Haimovich, Antônio H Ribeiro, Cynthia A Brandt, Daniel L Jacoby, Wade L Schulz, Harlan M Krumholz, Antonio Luiz P Ribeiro, Rohan Khera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Veer SanghaDepartment of Computer Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Bobak J MortazaviDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2655-2095
Adrian D HaimovichDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4106-7055
Antônio H RibeiroDepartment of Information Technology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Cynthia A BrandtDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Daniel L JacobySection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Wade L SchulzCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2048-4028
Harlan M KrumholzCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2046-127X
Antonio Luiz P RibeiroTelehealth Center and Cardiology Service, Hospital das Clínicas, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2740-0042
Rohan KheraCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA. rohan.khera@yale.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9467-6199

Funding

Evaluating and Improving Utilization of Evidence-Based Medical Therapy in Patients with Heart Failure using Automated Tools in the Electronic Health RecordK23HL153775 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI KHERA, ROHAN · 2021 to 2025
$918k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL153775
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of artificial intelligence (AI) for automated diagnosis of electrocardiograms (ECGs) can improve care in remote settings but is limited by the reliance on infrequently available signal-based data. We report the development of a multilabel automated diagnosis model for electrocardiographic images, more suitable for broader use. A total of 2,228,236 12-lead ECGs signals from 811 municipalities in Brazil are transformed to ECG images in varying lead conformations to train a convolutional neural network (CNN) identifying 6 physician-defined clinical labels spanning rhythm and conduction disorders, and a hidden label for gender. The image-based model performs well on a distinct test set validated by at least two cardiologists (average AUROC 0.99, AUPRC 0.86), an external validation set of 21,785 ECGs from Germany (average AUROC 0.97, AUPRC 0.73), and printed ECGs, with performance superior to signal-based models, and learning clinically relevant cues based on Grad-CAM. The model allows the application of AI to ECGs across broad settings.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceElectrocardiographyBrazilGermanyNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID35332137
PMCPMC8948243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.