Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35331575›Full record

ArticleHealth policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2022

Centralizing and decentralizing governance in the COVID-19 pandemic: The politics of credit and blame.

Scott L Greer, Sarah Rozenblum, Michelle Falkenbach, Olga Löblová, Holly Jarman, Noah Williams, Matthias Wismar

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
70.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic.Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Scott L GreerDepartment of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, 1420 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States of America; European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Eurostation, Place Victor Horta/Victor Hortaplein, 40/30, 1060 Brussels, Belgium. Electronic address: slgreer@umich.edu.
Sarah RozenblumDepartment of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, 1420 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States of America.
Michelle FalkenbachDepartment of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, 1420 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States of America; Department of Public and Ecosystem Health, Cornell University, Ithaca NY 18453, United States of America.
Olga LöblováDepartment of Sociology, University of Cambridge, Floor 2, 16 Mill Lane, Cambridge CB2 1SB, United Kingdom.
Holly JarmanDepartment of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, 1420 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States of America.
Noah WilliamsDepartment of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, 1420 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States of America.
Matthias WismarEuropean Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Eurostation, Place Victor Horta/Victor Hortaplein, 40/30, 1060 Brussels, Belgium.
University of Michigan · USEuropean Observatory on Health Systems and Policies · BECornell University · USUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 led to significant and dynamic shifts in power relations within and between governments, teaching us how governments make health policies and how health crises affect government. We focus on centralization and decentralization within and between governments: within government, meaning the extent to which the head of government controls policy; and between governments, meaning the extent to which the central government pre-empts or controls local and regional government. Political science literature suggests that shifting patterns of centralization and decentralization can be explained by leading politicians' efforts to gain credit for popular actions and outcomes and deflect blame for unpopular ones. We test this hypothesis in two ways: by coding the Health Systems Response Monitor's data on government responses, and through case studies of the governance of COVID-19 in Austria, Czechia and France. We find that credit and blame do substantially explain the timing and direction of changes in centralization and decentralization. In the first wave, spring 2020, heads of government centralized and raised their profile in order to gain credit for decisive action, but they subsequently tried to decentralize in order to avoid blame for repeated restrictions on life or surges of infection. These findings should shape advice on governance for pandemic response.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health PolicyHumansLocal GovernmentPandemicsPoliticsCoronavirusFederalismGovernanceHealth policyPublic health

Identifiers

PMID35331575
PMCPMC8913406
OpenAlexW4221031371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.