Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35331572›Full record

ArticlePatient education and counseling2022

Experiences of care coordination among older adults in the United States: Evidence from the Health and Retirement Study.

Marisa R Eastman, Viktoryia A Kalesnikava, Briana Mezuk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient education and counseling, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. SOARNet: Establishing an older adult focused practice-based research network.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026
    Article
  7. Exploring factors affecting the adoption and use of digital health technologies among older adults with cancer: A qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marisa R EastmanCenter for Social Epidemiology and Population Health, Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Viktoryia A KalesnikavaCenter for Social Epidemiology and Population Health, Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Briana MezukCenter for Social Epidemiology and Population Health, Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Research Center for Group Dynamics, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Electronic address: bmezuk@umich.edu.

Funding

HRS Yrs29-34: Y33 SSA CoFundingU01AG009740 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Jessica Faul, KENNETH M LANGA · 1990 to 2026
$555.8M
Michigan Center for Urban African American Aging Research - RESEARCH CORE (REC)P30AG015281 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Briana Mezuk · 1997 to 2026
$19.3M
Summer Training Program in Integrative Methods for Mental and Physical HealthR25AT010664 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MEZUK, BRIANA · 2020 to 2023
$1.0M
NCCIH NIH HHS R25 AT010664NIA NIH HHS P30 AG015281NIA NIH HHS U01 AG009740
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe goal of this study was to examine variation in patient experiences and perceptions of care coordination across sociodemographic and health factors.

methodsData come from the 2016 Health and Retirement Study (N = 1, 216). Three domains of coordination were assessed: 1) Perceptions (e.g., patient impressions of provider-provider communication), 2) Tangible supports (e.g., meeting with a care coordinator, being accompanied to appointments), and 3) Technical supports (e.g., use of a "patient portal"). Logistic regression was used to quantify the frequency of each domain and examine variation by racial minority status, socioeconomic status, and health status.

resultsApproximately 42% of older adults perceived poor care coordination, including 14.8% who reported receiving seemingly conflicting advice from different providers. Only one-third had ever met with a formal care coordinator, and 40% were occasionally accompanied to appointments. Although racial minorities were less likely to have access to technical supports, they were more likely to use them. Better perceived coordination was associated with higher care satisfaction (Odds Ratio: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.27-1.61).

conclusionsImportant gaps in care coordination remain for older adults. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Providers should consider assessing patient perceptions of care coordination to address these gaps in an equitable manner.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityRetirementAgedCommunicationHealth StatusHumansSocial ClassUnited StatesCare coordinationCare managementDisparitiesPatient-centered care

Identifiers

PMID35331572
PMCPMC9203919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.