Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35331368›Full record

ArticleDeutsches Arzteblatt international2022

Lipoprotein(a) and Metabolic Syndrome.

Nikolaus Buchmann, Till Ittermann, Ilja Demuth, Marcello R P Markus, Henry Völzke, Marcus Dörr, Nele Friedrich, Markus M Lerch, Raul D Santos, Sabine Schipf and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nikolaus BuchmannDepartment of Cardiology, Benjamin Franklin Campus, Charité - University Medical Center Berlin; Institute for Community Medicine, University Medical Center Greifswald; Biology of Aging Group, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolic Medicine (including Lipid Metabolism), Charité - University Medical Center Berlin, corporate member of Free University Berlin and Humboldt University of Berlin; Berlin Institute for Health Research at Charité - University Medical Center Berlin, BCRT - Berlin Center for Regenerative Therapy; Department of Internal Medicine B, University Medical Center Greifswald; German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Greifswald Site, Greifswald; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Greifswald Site, Greifswald; Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Greifswald; Department of Internal Medicine A, University Medical Center Greifswald; Lipid Clinic, Heart Institute (InCor), Medical Teaching Hospital, University of São Paulo, Brazil.
Till Ittermann
Ilja Demuth
Marcello R P Markus
Henry Völzke
Marcus Dörr
Nele Friedrich
Markus M Lerch
Raul D Santos
Sabine Schipf
Elisabeth Steinhagen-Thiessen
Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn inverse association between lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) and type 2 diabetes mellitus is well documented. However, data on the association of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) with Lp(a) are sparse.

methodsCross-sectional data for MetS and Lp(a) were available for 5743 BASE-II and SHIP-0 participants (48.7% men; age 58 [20-85] years) (BASE, Berlin Aging Study; SHIP, Study of Health in Pomerania). The association of MetS and its components with Lp(a) was analyzed by means of median regression adjusted for age, sex, and study. Associations were evaluated for the total population as well as stratified by sex and menopausal status.

resultsOverall, 27.6% (n = 1573) of the participants in the two studies had MetS and 22.5% (n = 1291) were premenopausal women. There was an inverse association between MetS and Lp(a) in the whole study sample (β = -11.9, 95% confidence interval [-21.3; -2.6]) as well as in men (β = -16.5 [-28.6; -4.3]). Participants with MetS (whole study sample) had 11.9 mmol/L lower Lp(a). Analogous results were found in postmenopausal women (β = -25.4 [-46.0; -4.8]). In premenopausal women with MetS, Lp(a) levels were higher by 39.1 mg/L on average [12.3; 65.9]) than in premenopausal women without MetS.

conclusionHormonal aspects and menopausal alterations seem to affect the association between MetS and Lp(a), as the expected inverse association was not present in premenopausal women.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Metabolic SyndromeCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLipoprotein(a)MaleMiddle AgedPremenopauseRisk FactorsLipoprotein(a)

Identifiers

PMID35331368
PMCPMC9400195
OpenAlexW4221011054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.