Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35331318›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2022

Comparison of immunohistochemical and qPCR methods from granulomatous dermatitis lesions for detection of leishmania in dogs living in endemic areas: a preliminary study.

Ilaria Porcellato, Giulia Morganti, Maria Teresa Antognoni, Katarzyna Małgorzata Walczak, Stefano De Arcangeli, Tommaso Furlanello, Cristina Bianca Quattrone, Fabrizia Veronesi, Chiara Brachelente

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Detection ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ilaria Porcellato *Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, Via San Costanzo 4, 06126, Perugia, Italy.
Giulia Morganti *Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, Via San Costanzo 4, 06126, Perugia, Italy.
Maria Teresa AntognoniDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, Via San Costanzo 4, 06126, Perugia, Italy.
Katarzyna Małgorzata WalczakFaculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Wolynska 33, 60-637, Poznań, Poland.
Stefano De ArcangeliSan Marco Veterinary Clinic and Laboratory, Via dell'Industria 3, 35030, Padova, Italy.
Tommaso FurlanelloSan Marco Veterinary Clinic and Laboratory, Via dell'Industria 3, 35030, Padova, Italy.
Cristina Bianca QuattroneConsulting Statistician, Via Salazar 2, 89123, Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Fabrizia VeronesiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, Via San Costanzo 4, 06126, Perugia, Italy. Fabrizia.veronesi@unipg.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1082-5666
Chiara BrachelenteDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, Via San Costanzo 4, 06126, Perugia, Italy.
University of Perugia · ITVeterinary Oncological Center · ITUniversity of Life Sciences in Poznań · PL

Funding

Università degli Studi di Perugia "Ricerca di Base 2018"
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn canine leishmaniosis (CanL) endemic areas, pathologists often receive skin biopsies for testing with histopathologic findings suggestive-but not conclusive for a definitive diagnosis-of CanL lesions. I the absence of data on the infective status of animals, the diagnosis can therefore be challenging. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the ability of immunohistochemistry (IHC) and quantitative PCR (qPCR) methods to detect Leishmania infection in skin biopsies with a histopathologic diagnosis of lymphoplasmacytic/histiocytic and/or granulomatous dermatitis and to correlate the pattern, depth and severity of the histopathologic lesions with the parasite load detected by qPCR and IHC.

methodsThirty formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded skin samples were evaluated by hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) staining, IHC, conventional PCR (cPCR) and qPCR. The severity, pattern and depth of the dermal inflammation and parasite load were graded.

resultsLeishmania was detected by H&E staining in 8/30 sections (26.66%) and by IHC in 14/30 samples (46.66%). Parasite DNA was detected in 14/30 samples (46.66%) by cPCR and in 21/30 samples (70%) by qPCR, with an extremely variable parasite load (1.32-62.700 copies). The level of agreement was fair between H&E staining and cPCR (κ = 0.32), and moderate between H&E staining and IHC (κ = 0.58). The level of agreement between IHC and cPCR was good (κ = 0.65); between IHC and qPCR, moderate (κ = 0.41); and between cPCR and qPCR, fair (κ = 0.28). A significant association was found between the severity of dermal inflammation and the parasitic skin load by IHC, although with weak linear correlation.

conclusionsOur study underlines the difficulty of obtaining a definitive diagnosis of CanL cutaneous lesions, even with the most accurate diagnostic tests currently available. Based on our results, no single test is suitable on its own for the diagnosis of cutaneous lesions caused by Leishmania. However, in the presence of a moderate/severe lymphoplasmacytic/histiocytic and/or granulomatous dermatitis, we suggest performing IHC, as in our study this technique proved to be the method with the highest discriminatory power to estimate the role of the parasite in skin lesions. In mild lesions, IHC loses its discriminatory power and should be effectively combined with techniques such as qPCR.

Indexed as

DermatitisDog DiseasesLeishmaniaAnimalsDogsImmunohistochemistryReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRetrospective StudiesDogGranulomatous dermatitisImmunohistochemistryLeishmaniaqPCR

Identifiers

PMID35331318
PMCPMC8944085
OpenAlexW4220868551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.