Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35331310›Full record

ArticleMolecular brain2022

Brain region networks for the assimilation of new associative memory into a schema.

Tomonori Takeuchi, Makoto Tamura, Dorothy Tse, Yasushi Kajii, Guillén Fernández, Richard G M Morris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular brain, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. To update or to create? The influence of novelty and prior knowledge on memory networks.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  4. Interplay of hippocampal long-term potentiation and long-term depression in enabling memory representations.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tomonori Takeuchi *Centre for Discovery Brain Sciences, Edinburgh Neuroscience, University of Edinburgh, 1 George Square, Edinburgh, EH8 9JZ, UK. tomonori.takeuchi@biomed.au.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-9981-4260
Makoto Tamura *Neuroscience Research Unit, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Kanagawa, 227-0033, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7034-8094
Dorothy TseCentre for Discovery Brain Sciences, Edinburgh Neuroscience, University of Edinburgh, 1 George Square, Edinburgh, EH8 9JZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2263-8139
Yasushi KajiiNeuroscience Research Unit, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Kanagawa, 227-0033, Japan.
Guillén FernándezDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, 6500 HB, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5522-0604
Richard G M MorrisCentre for Discovery Brain Sciences, Edinburgh Neuroscience, University of Edinburgh, 1 George Square, Edinburgh, EH8 9JZ, UK. r.g.m.morris@ed.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8661-1520

Funding

Wellcome Trust 207481/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alterations in long-range functional connectivity between distinct brain regions are thought to contribute to the encoding of memory. However, little is known about how the activation of an existing network of neocortical and hippocampal regions might support the assimilation of relevant new information into the preexisting knowledge structure or 'schema'. Using functional mapping for expression of plasticity-related immediate early gene products, we sought to identify the long-range functional network of paired-associate memory, and the encoding and assimilation of relevant new paired-associates. Correlational and clustering analyses for expression of immediate early gene products revealed that midline neocortical-hippocampal connectivity is strongly associated with successful memory encoding of new paired-associates against the backdrop of the schema, compared to both (1) unsuccessful memory encoding of new paired-associates that are not relevant to the schema, and (2) the mere retrieval of the previously learned schema. These findings suggest that the certain midline neocortical and hippocampal networks support the assimilation of newly encoded associative memories into a relevant schema.

Indexed as

BrainHippocampusCerebral CortexLearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingAnterior cingulate cortexAnterior retrosplenial cortexFunctional networkHippocampusMemory assimilationPaired-associate memoryPrelimbic cortexSchema

Identifiers

PMID35331310
PMCPMC8943948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.