Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35331304›Full record

Observational studyScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2022

Remote real-time supervision of prehospital point-of-care ultrasound: a feasibility study.

Martina Hermann, Christina Hafner, Vincenz Scharner, Mojca Hribersek, Mathias Maleczek, Andreas Schmid, Eva Schaden, Harald Willschke, Thomas Hamp

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04612816 completednot on this map

Live Stream of Emergency Ultrasound to Improve Diagnostics in Prehospital Medical Care: a Feasibility Study

TypeobservationalSponsorMedical University of ViennaRan2020 to 2021Enrolled25ConditionsUltrasoundArmsPrehospital ultrasound
NCT06672315 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Transesophageal Echocardiography in Pre-hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients; TAPCAP

TypeinterventionalSponsorJen-Tang SunRan2024 to 2027Enrolled60ConditionsOut-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA)Armstransesophageal echocardiography
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Live teleultrasound for evaluation of the chest: a systematic review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Contribution of point-of-care ultrasound in the prehospital management of patients with non-trauma acute dyspnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Ultrasound as a tool in prehospital settings: a scoping review.Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Echoes of precision: feedback, governance and ultrasound in prehospital care.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Article
  18. Lung Ultrasound in Critical Care: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Martina HermannDepartment of Anaesthesia, General Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Christina HafnerDepartment of Anaesthesia, General Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Vincenz ScharnerLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Patient Safety, Vienna, Austria.
Mojca HribersekLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Patient Safety, Vienna, Austria.
Mathias MaleczekDepartment of Anaesthesia, General Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Andreas SchmidDepartment of Anaesthesia, General Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Eva SchadenDepartment of Anaesthesia, General Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Harald WillschkeDepartment of Anaesthesia, General Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Thomas HampDepartment of Anaesthesia, General Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. thomas.hamp@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7294-9168
Austrian Institute for Health Technology Assessment GmbH · ATMedical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

Medical Scientific Fund of the Mayor of the City of Vienna MA 40-GMWF-21044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough prehospital point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is gaining in importance, its rapid interpretation remains challenging in prehospital emergency situations. The technical development of remote real-time supervision potentially offers the possibility to support emergency medicine providers during prehospital emergency ultrasound. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of live data transmission and supervision of prehospital POCUS in an urban environment and so to improve patients' safety.

methodsEmergency doctors with moderate ultrasound experience performed prehospital POCUS in emergency cases (n = 24) such as trauma, acute dyspnea or cardiac shock using the portable ultrasound device Lumify™. The ultrasound examination was remotely transmitted to an emergency ultrasound expert in the clinic for real-time supervision via a secure video and audio connection. Technical feasibility as well as quality of communication and live stream were analysed.

resultsPrehospital POCUS with remote real-time supervision was successfully performed in 17 patients (71%). In 3 cases, the expert was not available on time and in 1 case remote data transmission was not possible due to connection problems. In 3 cases tele-supervision was restricted to video only and no verbal communication was possible via the device itself due to power saving mode of the tablet.

conclusionRemote real-time supervision of prehospital POCUS in an urban environment is feasible most of the time with excellent image and communication quality.

trial registrationClinicalTrials Number NCT04612816.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesPoint-of-Care SystemsFeasibility StudiesHumansPoint-of-Care TestingUltrasonographyAnaesthesiologyDiagnostic imagingEchocardiographyEmergency medicinePatient safetySonographyTelemedicineUltrasonicsUltrasonographyUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID35331304
PMCPMC8944068
OpenAlexW4226134281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.