ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2022
CrossFit® open performance is affected by the nature of past competition experiences.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acute effect of a multi-ingredient pre-workout supplement on pacing and kinetic expression during shorter and longer bouts of high intensity functional training.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2025Trial
- Workout Duration Alters the Importance of Predictive Traits on High-Intensity Functional Training Workout Performance.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The influence of sex-division, experience, and pacing strategy on performance in the 2020 CrossFit® Open.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2024Article
- CrossFitSports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Normative Scores for CrossFitSports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Relationships Between Body Composition and Performance in the High-Intensity Functional Training Workout "Fran" are Modulated by Competition Class and Percentile Rank.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Quantifying CrossFitFrontiers in sports and active living · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo examine the relationships between past competition performances and 2020 CrossFit® Open (CFO) performance.
methodsA random selection from the top one thousand athletes (n = 220, 28.5 ± 4.4 years, 178 ± 7 cm, 87.5 ± 10.2 kg) were selected for this study. Overall and weekly performances (including ranks and scores) of the 2020 CFO, as well as overall ranks from all previous CFO, regional, and Games™ competitions in which they competed, were recorded from their publicly available online profile. The highest, lowest, average, and standard deviation (SD) of past rankings, as well as participation statistics (i.e., years since first appearance, total and consecutive appearances, and participation rate), were calculated for each competition stage. Relationships were then assessed between 2020 CFO performance and all past competition experience variables by calculating Kendall's tau (τ) correlation coefficients and Bayes factors (BF
resultsOverall and weekly ranking of the 2020 CFO was extremely favored (p < 0.001, BF
conclusionsAlthough specific relationships were found between 2020 CFO performance and individual appearances at regional and Games™ competitions, the most consistent relationships were seen with participation and ranking in past CFO competitions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.