Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35331223›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2022

Concepts of health in different contexts: a scoping review.

V P van Druten, E A Bartels, D van de Mheen, E de Vries, A P M Kerckhoffs, L M W Nahar-van Venrooij

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
463.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Monitoring and evaluation instruments of individual health in community settings: a scoping review.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Seizure freedom as a transitional phase of recovery: rethinking the burden of normality in epilepsy integrating medical and lived perspectives in post-remission care.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Health from a health promotion perspective: a concept analysis.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Construct Validity of the Measurement Tools PH42 and I.ROC12 to Measure Positive Health in a General Population.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

V P van DrutenJeroen Bosch Academy Research, Jeroen Bosch Hospital Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, PO Box 90153, Henri Dunantstraat 1, 's Hertogenbosch, 5223 GZ, the Netherlands. v.v.druten@jbz.nl.
E A BartelsTranzo Scientific Center for Care and Wellbeing, Tilburg University, PO Box 90153, Professor Cobbenhagenlaan 125, Tilburg, 5000 LE, the Netherlands.
D van de MheenTranzo Scientific Center for Care and Wellbeing, Tilburg University, PO Box 90153, Professor Cobbenhagenlaan 125, Tilburg, 5000 LE, the Netherlands.
E de VriesJeroen Bosch Academy Research, Jeroen Bosch Hospital Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, PO Box 90153, Henri Dunantstraat 1, 's Hertogenbosch, 5223 GZ, the Netherlands.
A P M KerckhoffsDepartment of Nephrology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands.
L M W Nahar-van VenrooijJeroen Bosch Academy Research, Jeroen Bosch Hospital Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, PO Box 90153, Henri Dunantstraat 1, 's Hertogenbosch, 5223 GZ, the Netherlands.
Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis · NLTilburg University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rationale of our study was that the World Health Organization's (WHO) definition of health from 1947 which includes "… complete physical, mental and social wellbeing…" does not fit the current societal viewpoints anymore. The WHO's definition of health implies that many people with chronic illnesses or disabilities would be considered unhealthy and complete wellbeing would be utopian and unfeasible for them. This is no longer uniformly accepted. Many alternative concepts of health have been discussed in the last decades such as 'positive health', which focusses on someone's capability rather than incapability,. However, the question remains whether a general health concept can guide all healthcare practices. More likely, health concepts need to be specified for professions or settings. The objective of our study was to create a structured overview of published concepts of health from different perspectives by conducting a scoping review using the PRISMA-ScR guideline. A literature search was conducted in Pubmed and Cinahl. Articles eligible for inclusion focussed on the discussion or the conceptualisation of health or health-related concepts in different contexts (such as the perspective of care workers' or patients') published since 2009 (the Dutch Health Council raised the discussion about moving towards a more dynamic perspective on health in that year). Seventy-five articles could be included for thematic analyses. The results showed that most articles described a concept of health consisting of multiple subthemes; no consensus was found on one overall concept of health. This implies that healthcare consumers act based on different health concepts when seeking care than care workers when providing care. Having different understandings of the concepts of health can lead to misunderstandings in practice. In conclusion, from every perspective, and even for every individual, health may mean something different. This finding stresses the importance that care workers' and healthcare consumers' meaning of 'health' has to be clear to all actors involved. Our review supports a more uniform tuning of healthcare between healthcare providers (the organisations), care workers (the professionals) and healthcare consumers (the patients), by creating more awareness of the differences among these actors, which can be a guide in their communication.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHealth PersonnelCommunicationGlobal HealthHumansHealthHealth conceptHealth definitionHealth perceptionHealth-related conceptsPerceived healthPositive healthScoping review

Identifiers

PMID35331223
PMCPMC8953139
OpenAlexW4221129097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.