Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35331142›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2022

The heat is on: a simple method to increase genome editing efficiency in plants.

Jonas Blomme, Ward Develtere, Ayse Köse, Júlia Arraiza Ribera, Christophe Brugmans, Jessica Jaraba-Wallace, Ward Decaestecker, Debbie Rombaut, Alexandra Baekelandt, Álvaro Daniel Fernández Fernández and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jonas BlommeDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, 9052, Ghent, Belgium.
Ward DeveltereDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, 9052, Ghent, Belgium.
Ayse KöseBioengineering Department, Ege University, 35100, Izmir, Turkey.
Júlia Arraiza RiberaDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, 9052, Ghent, Belgium.
Christophe BrugmansDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, 9052, Ghent, Belgium.
Jessica Jaraba-WallaceDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, 9052, Ghent, Belgium.
Ward DecaesteckerDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, 9052, Ghent, Belgium.
Debbie RombautDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, 9052, Ghent, Belgium.
Alexandra BaekelandtDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, 9052, Ghent, Belgium.
Álvaro Daniel Fernández FernándezDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, 9052, Ghent, Belgium.
Frank Van BreusegemDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, 9052, Ghent, Belgium.
Dirk InzéDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, 9052, Ghent, Belgium.
Thomas JacobsDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, 9052, Ghent, Belgium. thjac@psb.ugent.be.
VIB-UGent Center for Plant Systems Biology · BEGhent University · BEEge University · TR

Funding

Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds UGent BOF20/PDO/016Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds UGent BOFMET2015000201Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 12T3418NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 3G038719
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrecision genome mutagenesis using CRISPR/Cas has become the standard method to generate mutant plant lines. Several improvements have been made to increase mutagenesis efficiency, either through vector optimisation or the application of heat stress.

resultsHere, we present a simplified heat stress assay that can be completed in six days using commonly-available laboratory equipment. We show that three heat shocks (3xHS) efficiently increases indel efficiency of LbCas12a and Cas9, irrespective of the target sequence or the promoter used to express the nuclease. The generated indels are primarily somatic, but for three out of five targets we demonstrate that up to 25% more biallelic mutations are transmitted to the progeny when heat is applied compared to non-heat controls. We also applied our heat treatment to lines containing CRISPR base editors and observed a 22-27% increase in the percentage of C-to-T base editing. Furthermore, we test the effect of 3xHS on generating large deletions and a homologous recombination reporter. Interestingly, we observed no positive effect of 3xHS treatment on either approach using our conditions.

conclusionsTogether, our experiments show that heat treatment is consistently effective at increasing the number of somatic mutations using many CRISPR approaches in plants and in some cases can increase the recovery of mutant progeny.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingGenome, PlantMutagenesisPlants, Genetically ModifiedBase editingCRISPRGenome engineeringHeat-shockHomology-directed repairPlant biotechnology

Identifiers

PMID35331142
PMCPMC8951696
OpenAlexW4226199501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.