Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35331034›Full record

ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2023

Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) stenting or angioplasty for intracranial carotid artery stenosis: Case series and novel application.

Keaton Piper, Jeffrey Farooq, Elton Yeung, Gabriel Flores-Milan, Harry Van Loveren, Tsz Lau

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Keaton PiperDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5051-8866
Jeffrey FarooqDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Elton YeungLi Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
Gabriel Flores-MilanDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8327-0126
Harry Van LoverenDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Tsz LauDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
University of South Florida · USUniversity of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCarotid artery stenting is associated with a higher rate of stroke compared to carotid endarterectomy (CEA). This is likely due to procedural emboli resulting from plaque disruption. The transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) method aims to reduce the stroke rate by flow-reversal. TCAR, which has yet to be utilized for intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD), may be particularly valuable given the lack of surgical treatment options for intracranial arterial stenosis.

objectivePresented here are five cases of angioplasty or stenting that demonstrate the feasibility of TCAR for intracranial Internal Carotid Artery (ICA) stenosis treatment.

methodsFive cases were reviewed retrospectively and summarized using PROCESS and CARE guidelines.

resultsAll patients who underwent intervention between the petrous and ophthalmic segment of the ICA had no new neurologic deficit nor detected embolic stroke. One patient experienced an asymptomatic 5 mm hemorrhage on postoperative routine Computed Tomography (CT) head imaging.

conclusionsThis highlights a new method for treating intracranial ICA stenosis with a potentially reduced stroke risk. Given the historically higher stroke rates for cervical ICA stenting compared to carotid artery endarterectomy, this method may improve the previously higher stroke rates in endovascular carotid artery treatment, compared to CEA. Although this series is small, it illustrates a novel use for a rising technique that should be further evaluated in a larger study to validate its efficacy as a new treatment modality for surgically inaccessible intracranial disease.

Indexed as

Carotid StenosisEndarterectomy, CarotidEndovascular ProceduresStrokeAngioplastyCarotid ArteriesConstriction, PathologicHumansRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsStentsTreatment Outcomecarotid artery angioplastycarotid artery stenosiscarotid artery stentintracranial stenosisTCAR

Identifiers

PMID35331034
PMCPMC10399509
OpenAlexW4220663528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.