ReviewCirculation. Heart failure2022
Proposed Cardiac End Points for Clinical Trials in Immunoglobulin Light Chain Amyloidosis: Report From the Amyloidosis Forum Cardiac Working Group.
Review in Circulation. Heart failure, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and Safety of Anselamimab in Immunoglobulin Light Chain Amyloidosis: Results From the Randomized CARES Trials.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2026Trial
- Changes in Myocardial Light Chain Amyloid Burden After Plasma Cell Therapy.JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2025Trial
- Defining Heart Failure Endpoint in ATTR Amyloidosis Clinical Trials: Time for an Update?Cardiology and therapy · 2026Review
- Emerging Pharmacological Strategies for Cardiac Amyloidosis: A Qualitative Analysis of Interventional Clinical Trials Registered on ClinicalTrials.Gov.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Amyloidosis in Korea: A 14-Year Nationwide Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Cardiovascular determinants of the 6-minute walk distance in cardiac transthyretin amyloidosis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Patient-reported outcomes - the missing link to advancing light chain (AL) amyloidosis clinical research.Blood reviews · 2025Review
- Cardiac Amyloidosis: A Narrative Review of Diagnostic Advances and Emerging Therapies.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Development of Imaging Endpoints for Clinical Trials in AL and ATTR Amyloidosis: Proceedings of the Amyloidosis Forum.JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2025Review
- Functional Status and Quality of Life in Light-Chain Amyloidosis: Advanced Imaging, Longitudinal Changes, and Outcomes.JACC. Heart failure · 2024Article
- Autologous stem cell transplantation in AL amyloidosis: Muddy waters.Blood reviews · 2024Review
- Renal Response Criteria for Clinical Trials in Amyloid Light Chain Amyloidosis.Kidney international reports · 2024Review
- Pathway for Development and Validation of Multi-domain Endpoints for Amyloid Light Chain (AL) Amyloidosis.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2024Review
- Advancing Transthyretin Amyloidosis Drug Development in an Evolving Treatment Landscape: Amyloidosis Forum Meeting Proceedings.Advances in therapy · 2024Review
- Peripheral Nervous, Hepatic, and Gastrointestinal Endpoints for AL Amyloidosis Clinical Trials: Report from the Amyloidosis Forum Multi-organ System Working Group.Advances in therapy · 2023Review
- Natriuretic Peptides and Cardiac Troponins: Markers of Disease Progression and Risk in Light Chain Cardiac Amyloidosis.Current heart failure reports · 2023Review
- Differences in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) by disease severity in light chain (AL) amyloidosis.European journal of haematology · 2023Article
- Health-Related Quality of Life Instruments for Clinical Trials in AL Amyloidosis: Report from the Amyloidosis Forum HRQOL Working Group.Patient related outcome measures · 2023Review
- Targeting Amyloid Fibrils by Passive Immunotherapy in Systemic Amyloidosis.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis is a rare, multisystemic, phenotypically heterogenous disease affecting cardiovascular, renal, neurological, and gastrointestinal systems to varying degrees. Its underlying cause is a plasma cell dyscrasia characterized by misfolding of monoclonal immunoglobulin light chains which leads to aggregation and deposition of insoluble amyloid fibrils in target organs. Prognosis is primarily dependent on extent of cardiac involvement and depth of hematologic response to treatment. To facilitate development of new therapies, a public-private partnership was formed between the nonprofit Amyloidosis Research Consortium and the US Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. In 2020, the Amyloidosis Forum launched an initiative to identify novel/composite end points and analytic strategies to expedite clinical trials for development of new therapies for the primary hematologic disorder and organ system manifestations. Specialized working groups identified organ-specific end points; additional working groups reviewed health-related quality of life measures and statistical approaches to data analysis. Each working group comprised amyloidosis experts, patient representatives, statisticians, and representatives from the Food and Drug Administration, the UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, and pharmaceutical companies. This review summarizes the proceedings and recommendations of the Cardiac Working Group. Using a modified Delphi method, the group identified, reviewed, and prioritized cardiac end points relevant to immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis in the context of an antiplasma cell therapy. Prioritized cardiovascular end points included overall survival, hospitalization, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide level, 6-minute walk test, Kansas City Cardiac Questionnaire, and cardiac deterioration progression-free survival. These recommended components will be further explored through evaluation of clinical trial datasets and formal guidance from regulatory authorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.