Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35330961›Full record

Article3 Biotech2022

Enhanced keratinase production by

Ana Maria Mazotto, Sabrina M L Cedrola, Edilma P de Souza, Sonia Couri, Alane B Vermelho

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in 3 Biotech, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Composting Poultry Feathers with KeratinolyticMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Response surface methodology based optimization of keratinase fromSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  4. Keratinolytic Properties ofInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ana Maria MazottoLaboratory of Microbial Biocatalysis, General Microbiology Department, Microbiology Institute, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 21941-902 Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4858-2540
Sabrina M L CedrolaBiotechnology Lab-Bioinovar, General Microbiology Department, Microbiology Institute, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 21941-902 Brazil.
Edilma P de SouzaBiotechnology Lab-Bioinovar, General Microbiology Department, Microbiology Institute, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 21941-902 Brazil.
Sonia CouriLaboratory of Microbial Biocatalysis, General Microbiology Department, Microbiology Institute, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 21941-902 Brazil.
Alane B VermelhoBiotechnology Lab-Bioinovar, General Microbiology Department, Microbiology Institute, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 21941-902 Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5926-4172
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The poultry industry produces millions of tons of feathers waste that can be transformed into valuable products through bioprocess. The study describes the enhanced keratinase and feather hydrolysate production by Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13205-022-03153-y.

Indexed as

Bacillus subtilis AMRFeatherFractional factorial designKeratinaseProtein hydrolysate

Identifiers

PMID35330961
PMCPMC8917247
OpenAlexW4221126514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.