Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35330940›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2022

Percutaneous coronary intervention during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan: Insights from the nationwide registration data.

Kyohei Yamaji, Shun Kohsaka, Taku Inohara, Yohei Numasawa, Hirohiko Ando, Hideki Wada, Hideki Ishii, Tetsuya Amano, Hiroaki Miyata, Yuji Ikari and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Kyohei YamajiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin-Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
Shun KohsakaDepartment of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Taku InoharaDepartment of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yohei NumasawaDepartment of Cardiology, Japanese Red Cross Ashikaga Hospital, Ashikaga, Japan.
Hirohiko AndoDepartment of Cardiology, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Japan.
Hideki WadaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Juntendo University Shizuoka Hospital, Izunokuni, Japan.
Hideki IshiiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine.
Tetsuya AmanoDepartment of Cardiology, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Japan.
Hiroaki MiyataDepartment of Healthcare Quality Assessment, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Japan.
Yuji IkariDepartment of Cardiology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
J-PCI Registry Investigators
Aichi Medical University · JPKeio University · JPAshikaga Red Cross Hospital · JPGunma University · JPJuntendo University Shizuoka Hospital · JPKyoto University · JPThe University of Tokyo · JPTokai University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has negatively affected access to healthcare systems and treatment timelines. This study was designed to explore the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: From January 2019 to December 2020, 489,001 patients from 1068 institutions were registered in the Japanese nationwide PCI (J-PCI) registry. We constructed generalized linear models to assess the difference in the daily number of patients and in-hospital outcomes between 2019 and 2020. Findings: In total, 207 institutions (19·3%) had closed or restricted access during the first COVID-19 outbreak in May 2020; the number of closed or restricted institutions had plateaued at a median of 121 institutions (11·3%). The daily case volume of PCI significantly decreased in 2020 (by 6·7% compared with that in 2019; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6·2-7·2%; Interpretation: While the number of patients who underwent PCI substantially decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic, more patients presented with high-risk characteristics and were associated with significantly higher adjusted in-hospital mortality. Funding: The J-PCI registry is a registry led and supported by the Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics. The present study was supported by the Grant-in-Aid from the Ministry of Health and Labour (No. 20IA2002 and 21FA1015), the Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (KAKENHI; No. 21K08064), and the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (No. 17ek0210097h000).

Indexed as

Coronavirus disease 2019Percutaneous coronary interventionST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID35330940
PMCPMC8939342
OpenAlexW4220944858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.