Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35330880›Full record

ArticleClinical parkinsonism & related disorders2022

Efficacy and safety of two incobotulinumtoxinA injection intervals in cervical dystonia patients with inadequate benefit from standard injection intervals of botulinum toxin: Phase 4, open-label, randomized, noninferiority study.

Cynthia Comella, Robert A Hauser, Stuart H Isaacson, Daniel Truong, Odinachi Oguh, Jennifer Hui, Eric S Molho, Matthew Brodsky, Erin Furr-Stimming, Georg Comes and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01486264 (An Open-Label, Non-Inferiority Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Two Injection Schedules of Xeomin®), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01486264 phase4completednot on this map

An Open-Label, Non-Inferiority Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Two Injection Schedules of Xeomin® (incobotulinumtoxinA) [Short Flex Versus Long Flex] in Subjects With Cervical Dystonia With < 10 Weeks of Benefit From OnabotulinumtoxinA Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorMerz Pharmaceuticals GmbHRan2012 to 2016Enrolled283ConditionsCervical DystoniaArmsXeomin®
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Cynthia ComellaDepartment of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Robert A HauserParkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Center of Excellence, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Stuart H IsaacsonParkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Center of Boca Raton, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
Daniel TruongDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA.
Odinachi OguhCleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
Jennifer HuiUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Eric S MolhoAlbany Medical Center Neurosciences Institute, Albany, NY, USA.
Matthew BrodskyOregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Erin Furr-StimmingThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA.
Georg ComesMerz Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Michael A HastMerz Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Raleigh, NC, USA.
David CharlesDepartment of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IntroductionSome patients with cervical dystonia (CD) receiving long-term botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) therapy report early waning of treatment benefit before the typical 12-week reinjection interval. Methods: This phase 4, open-label, randomized, noninferiority study (CD Flex; NCT01486264) compared 2 incobotulinumtoxinA injection schedules (Short Flex: 8 ± 2 weeks; Long Flex: 14 ± 2 weeks) in CD patients. Previous BoNT-responsive subjects who reported acceptable clinical benefit lasting < 10 weeks were recruited. Efficacy and safety were evaluated after 8 injection cycles. The primary endpoint was change in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) severity subscale 4 weeks after the eighth injection. Secondary endpoints included TWSTRS total and subscale scores. Immunogenicity was assessed in a subset of patients. Results: Two hundred eighty-two CD patients were randomized and treated (Short Flex, N = 142; Long Flex, N = 140), and 207 completed the study. Significant improvements in TWSTRS severity from study baseline to 4 weeks after cycle 8 were observed in both the Short Flex (4.1 points; Conclusion: Injection cycles < 10 weeks for incobotulinumtoxinA are effective (and noninferior to longer intervals) for treating CD patients with early waning of clinical benefit. Shorter injection intervals did not increase AEs or lead to loss of treatment effect.

Indexed as

BoNTBotulinum toxinCervical dystoniaIncobotulinumtoxinAMovement disorders

Identifiers

PMID35330880
PMCPMC8938329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.