Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35330765›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022

Capture Sequencing Enables Sensitive Detection of Tick-Borne Agents in Human Blood.

Santiago Sanchez-Vicente, Komal Jain, Teresa Tagliafierro, Alper Gokden, Vishal Kapoor, Cheng Guo, Elizabeth J Horn, W Ian Lipkin, Rafal Tokarz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Xenodiagnosis to Search for Borrelia burgdorferi After Antibiotic Treatment of Lyme Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Santiago Sanchez-VicenteCenter for Infection and Immunity, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York City, NY, United States.
Komal JainCenter for Infection and Immunity, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York City, NY, United States.
Teresa TagliafierroCenter for Infection and Immunity, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York City, NY, United States.
Alper GokdenCenter for Infection and Immunity, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York City, NY, United States.
Vishal KapoorCenter for Infection and Immunity, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York City, NY, United States.
Cheng GuoCenter for Infection and Immunity, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York City, NY, United States.
Elizabeth J HornLyme Disease Biobank, Portland, OR, United States.
W Ian LipkinCenter for Infection and Immunity, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York City, NY, United States.
Rafal TokarzCenter for Infection and Immunity, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York City, NY, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assay sensitivity can be a limiting factor in the use of PCR as a tool for the detection of tick-borne pathogens in blood. We evaluated the performance of Tick-borne disease Capture Sequencing Assay (TBDCapSeq), a capture sequencing assay targeting tick-borne agents, to test 158 whole blood specimens obtained from the Lyme Disease Biobank. These included samples from 98 individuals with signs and symptoms of acute Lyme disease, 25 healthy individuals residing in Lyme disease endemic areas, and 35 samples collected from patients admitted to the Massachusetts General Hospital or referred to the infectious disease clinic. Compared to PCR, TBDCapSeq had better sensitivity and could identify infections with a wider range of tick-borne agents. TBDCapSeq identified a higher rate of samples positive for

Indexed as

BabesiababesiosisBorreliaLyme diseasenext generation sequencingTBDCapSeqtick-borne agents

Identifiers

PMID35330765
PMCPMC8940530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.