Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35330758›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces2022

Hexacene on Cu(110) and Ag(110): Influence of the Substrate on Molecular Orientation and Interfacial Charge Transfer.

Marie S Sättele, Andreas Windischbacher, Katharina Greulich, Larissa Egger, Anja Haags, Hans Kirschner, Ruslan Ovsyannikov, Erika Giangrisostomi, Alexander Gottwald, Mathias Richter and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Highly Ordered Single DomainThe journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Marie S SätteleInstitute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, University of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 18, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Andreas WindischbacherInstitute of Physics, University of Graz, NAWI Graz, Universitätsplatz 5, 8010 Graz, Austria.
Katharina GreulichInstitute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, University of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 18, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Larissa EggerInstitute of Physics, University of Graz, NAWI Graz, Universitätsplatz 5, 8010 Graz, Austria.
Anja HaagsPeter Grünberg Institut (PGI-3), Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany.
Hans KirschnerPhysikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Abbestrasse 2-12, 10587 Berlin, Germany.
Ruslan OvsyannikovInstitute for Methods and Instrumentation in Synchrotron Radiation Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie GmbH, Albert-Einstein-Straße 15, 12489 Berlin, Germany.
Erika GiangrisostomiInstitute for Methods and Instrumentation in Synchrotron Radiation Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie GmbH, Albert-Einstein-Straße 15, 12489 Berlin, Germany.
Alexander GottwaldPhysikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Abbestrasse 2-12, 10587 Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2810-7419
Mathias RichterPhysikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Abbestrasse 2-12, 10587 Berlin, Germany.
Serguei SoubatchPeter Grünberg Institut (PGI-3), Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1455-0260
F Stefan TautzPeter Grünberg Institut (PGI-3), Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany.
Michael G RamseyInstitute of Physics, University of Graz, NAWI Graz, Universitätsplatz 5, 8010 Graz, Austria.
Peter PuschnigInstitute of Physics, University of Graz, NAWI Graz, Universitätsplatz 5, 8010 Graz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8057-7795
Georg KollerInstitute of Physics, University of Graz, NAWI Graz, Universitätsplatz 5, 8010 Graz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7741-2394
Holger F BettingerInstitute of Organic Chemistry, University of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 18, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5223-662X
Thomas ChasséInstitute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, University of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 18, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6442-8944
Heiko PeisertInstitute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, University of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 18, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9742-5800

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF I 3731Austrian Science Fund FWF I 4145
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hexacene, composed of six linearly fused benzene rings, is an organic semiconductor material with superior electronic properties. The fundamental understanding of the electronic and chemical properties is prerequisite to any possible application in devices. We investigate the orientation and interface properties of highly ordered hexacene monolayers on Ag(110) and Cu(110) with X-ray photoemission spectroscopy (XPS), photoemission orbital tomography (POT), X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS), low-energy electron diffraction (LEED), scanning tunneling microscopy (STM), and density functional theory (DFT). We find pronounced differences in the structural arrangement of the molecules and the electronic properties at the metal/organic interfaces for the two substrates. While on Cu(110) the molecules adsorb with their long molecular axis parallel to the high symmetry substrate direction, on Ag(110), hexacene adsorbs in an azimuthally slightly rotated geometry with respect to the metal rows of the substrate. In both cases, molecular planes are oriented parallel to the substrate. A pronounced charge transfer from both substrates to different molecular states affects the effective charge of different C atoms of the molecule. Through analysis of experimental and theoretical data, we found out that on Ag(110) the LUMO of the molecule is occupied through charge transfer from the metal, whereas on Cu(110) even the LUMO+1 receives a charge. Interface dipoles are determined to a large extent by the push-back effect, which are also found to differ significantly between

Identifiers

PMID35330758
PMCPMC8935373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.