ArticleJPRAS open2022
Operative technique and management of central foot polydactyly.
Article in JPRAS open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correlation analysis of surgical outcomes and preoperative psychological status in adolescents with polydactyly/syndactyly.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Isolated Unilateral Heptadactyly With Combined Preaxial and Postaxial Polydactyly of the Foot in a 9-Month-Old Infant.Case reports in orthopedics · 2026Article
- Treatment for central polydactyly of the foot with nine toes: a rare case report.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Surgical Treatment of Central Type Mirror Foot Associated with Eight Toes: A Case Report.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polydactyly is characterized by the manifestation of supernumerary digits in the hands and feet. It can be isolated or associated with a genetic syndrome. Based on the location of duplication, it is categorized as preaxial, postaxial, or central. The latter is a rare abnormality, comprising approximately 6% of cases. There is a paucity in the literature regarding this congenital anomaly and its overall management. Nonoperative treatment is generally unsuccessful in managing symptoms such as excessive width, abnormal digit alignment, and growth. Though surgical management addresses the individual patient's needs, general goals include preservation of digits with the greatest axial alignment, resection of symptomatic digits, alignment correction of the remaining great toe, stabilization of the soft tissues, and adequate soft tissue coverage. This study aims to delineate effective operative techniques for central foot polydactyly. Two patient cases are discussed, providing a framework for pre and postoperative care, complications, and outcomes. The techniques detailed offer a straightforward, efficacious, and safe method to reconstruct central foot polydactyly, returning form and function to the patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.