Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35330611›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2022

Multicenter Study of Clinical Presentation, Treatment, and Outcome in 41 Dogs With Spinal Epidural Empyema.

Emma J Laws, Lluís Sánchez, Elsa Beltran, Elisabet Domínguez, Abel B Ekiri, Josep Brocal, Luisa De Risio

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emma J LawsLinnaeus Veterinary Limited, Solihull, United Kingdom.
Lluís SánchezNeurology/Neurosurgery Service, Willows Veterinary Centre and Referral Centre, Linnaeus Veterinary Limited, Solihull, United Kingdom.
Elsa BeltranNeurology/Neurosurgery Service, Queen Mother Hospital for Animals, Royal Veterinary College, Potters Bar, United Kingdom.
Elisabet DomínguezDiagnostic Imaging Service, Anicura ARS Hospital Veterinari, Barcelona, Spain.
Abel B EkiriDepartment of Veterinary Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.
Josep BrocalNeurology/Neurosurgery Service, Anderson Moores, Linnaeus Veterinary Limited, Winchester, United Kingdom.
Luisa De RisioLinnaeus Veterinary Limited, Solihull, United Kingdom.
Royal Veterinary College · GBUniversity of Surrey · GBWillows Veterinary Centre and Referral Service · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is limited information on canine spinal epidural empyema (SEE). The aim of this multicenter retrospective study is to describe the clinical presentation and outcome of dogs undergoing spinal surgery or conservative management for SEE. Forty-one dogs met the inclusion criteria; the SEE was treated surgically in 17 dogs and conservatively in 24 dogs. Two dogs underwent spinal surgery after failure of conservative management, meaning that 19 dogs in total had spinal surgery. Long-term (i.e., >6 months) follow-up was available in 35 dogs (19 conservatively treated and 16 surgically treated dogs). Recovery to a functional pet status was achieved in 15/19 (78.9%) conservatively treated and 12/16 (75%) surgically treated dogs. There was no significant difference (

Indexed as

dogempyemaepiduralinfectionspinal epidural abscessspinal epidural empyema

Identifiers

PMID35330611
PMCPMC8940254
OpenAlexW4220676015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.