ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022
Three-Dimensional Reconstruction Algorithm-Based Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Biomechanical Changes in Articular Cartilage in Patients after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomechanical characteristics of ligament injuries in the knee joint during impact in the upright position: a finite element analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
- Finite element analysis of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques: A comparison of the mechanical properties of all-inside fixation and traditional fixation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the evaluation of biomechanical changes in articular cartilage in patients after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based on a three-dimensional (3D) finite element model. The data of 90 patients undergoing arthroscopic ACL reconstruction in the hospital were collected and divided into the stable group (54 cases) and the unstable group (36 cases). A load of up to 134N was applied to the 3D finite element model, and the kinematics of knee flexion at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° were examined. The tibial anteversion, tibial rotation, and ACL/graft tension were recorded in the 3D finite element model, which was randomly divided into the normal group (intact group,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.