ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2022
Neurotrophic keratopathy: Clinical presentation and effects of cenegermin.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To report on 4 patients (3 adults, 1 child) with neurotrophic keratopathy (NK) treated with cenegermin 20 μg/ml (Oxervate®), a recombinant human nerve growth factor (rhNGF), which was authorized by the European Medicines Agency for the treatment of neurotrophic keratopathy stage 2 and stage 3 of Mackie Classification in patients over 18 years of age. Observations: Three patients with neurotrophic keratopathy stage 2 and 1 patient with neurotrophic keratopathy stage 3, who were treated with cenegermin eye drops 6 times daily for 8 weeks, were observed. Two patients suffered from herpetic keratitis and 2 patients from neurotrophic keratopathy secondary to orbital radiation. In addition to closure of epithelial defects, an increase of corneal sensitivity and improvement of visual acuity has been shown in all treated patients at the end of therapy. One patient reported on neuralgic pain as a side effect. The corneal epithelium remained closed during the follow-up period of 11 weeks, 31 and 32 months after cessation of therapy in 3 patients, respectively. In one patient, corneal erosion recurred 4 weeks after completion of treatment due to recurrent HSV keratitis, which resolved after therapy adjustment and the corneal epithelium remained closed for 35 weeks. Conclusion: The cases presented suggest that treatment with cenegermin 20 μg/ml not only promotes corneal epithelial wound healing, but also significantly improves corneal sensitivity and visual acuity with minor side effects in adults and children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.