Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35330479›Full record

ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2022

Towards Machine Learning-Aided Lung Cancer Clinical Routines: Approaches and Open Challenges.

Francisco Silva, Tania Pereira, Inês Neves, Joana Morgado, Cláudia Freitas, Mafalda Malafaia, Joana Sousa, João Fonseca, Eduardo Negrão, Beatriz Flor de Lima and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Francisco SilvaINESC TEC-Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-3069-2282
Tania PereiraINESC TEC-Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1681-2436
Inês NevesINESC TEC-Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.
Joana MorgadoINESC TEC-Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-5591-1579
Cláudia FreitasCHUSJ-Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de São João, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-7162-414X
Mafalda MalafaiaINESC TEC-Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.
Joana SousaINESC TEC-Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.
João FonsecaINESC TEC-Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.
Eduardo NegrãoCHUSJ-Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de São João, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.
Beatriz Flor de LimaCHUSJ-Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de São João, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.
Miguel Correia da SilvaCHUSJ-Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de São João, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-5392-2808
António J MadureiraCHUSJ-Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de São João, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.
Isabel RamosCHUSJ-Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de São João, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.
José Luis CostaFMUP-Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-7132-4094
Venceslau HespanholCHUSJ-Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de São João, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.
António CunhaINESC TEC-Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-3458-7693
Hélder P OliveiraINESC TEC-Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-6193-8540
Universidade do Porto · PTHospital de São João · PTINESC TEC · PTUniversity of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advancements in the development of computer-aided decision (CAD) systems for clinical routines provide unquestionable benefits in connecting human medical expertise with machine intelligence, to achieve better quality healthcare. Considering the large number of incidences and mortality numbers associated with lung cancer, there is a need for the most accurate clinical procedures; thus, the possibility of using artificial intelligence (AI) tools for decision support is becoming a closer reality. At any stage of the lung cancer clinical pathway, specific obstacles are identified and "motivate" the application of innovative AI solutions. This work provides a comprehensive review of the most recent research dedicated toward the development of CAD tools using computed tomography images for lung cancer-related tasks. We discuss the major challenges and provide critical perspectives on future directions. Although we focus on lung cancer in this review, we also provide a more clear definition of the path used to integrate AI in healthcare, emphasizing fundamental research points that are crucial for overcoming current barriers.

Indexed as

computer-aided decisionCT scanlearning modelslung cancer

Identifiers

PMID35330479
PMCPMC8950137
OpenAlexW4221112170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.