ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2022
eHealth and mHealth in Chronic Diseases-Identification of Barriers, Existing Solutions, and Promoters Based on a Survey of EU Stakeholders Involved in Regions4PerMed (H2020).
Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outpatients' Readiness for Engagement in Health Information Technology: Implications for Patient Education in University Hospitals of Southern Iran.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Digital Health Communication Strategies for Supporting Healthy Lifestyles in Adults with Noncommunicable Diseases and Limited Health Literacy: A Scoping Review.Iranian journal of public health · 2025Review
- Enhancing Self-Care Education in Celiac Disease Through Mobile Health: A Systematic Review.Health science reports · 2025Review
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward disease management among alopecia areata patients.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Barriers to the Utilization of mHealth Applications in Saudi Arabia: Insights from Patients with Chronic Diseases.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Public knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward heat stroke in Ningbo, China: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Acceptability and usability of a nurse-assisted remote patient monitoring intervention for the post-hospital follow-up of patients with long-term illness: A qualitative study.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2024Article
- Acceptance and use of mobile health technology in post-abortion care.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Research Trends and Hot Spots in Telemedicine for the Elderly: A Scientometric Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Exploring online health information seeking and sharing among older adults: a mini-review about acceptance, potentials, and barriers.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Review
- Shifting Responsibilities: Developing a Pan-European Service Model for an eHealth Technology Supporting Self-Management of People with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Comorbidities.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2024Article
- Contributing factors involved in the safety of elderly people with chronic illness in home healthcare: a qualitative study.BMJ open quality · 2023Article
- Exploring mHealth applications for self-management of chronic low back pain: A survey of features and benefits.Heliyon · 2023Review
- Personalised Medicine-Implementation to the Healthcare System in Europe (Focus Group Discussions).Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of Personalised Medicine across Europe.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Diffusion of a Lifelog-Based Digital Healthcare Platform for Future Precision Medicine: Data Provision and Verification Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn recent years, rapid population ageing has become a worldwide phenomenon. Both electronic health services (eHealth) and mobile health services (mHealth) are becoming important components of healthcare delivery. The market for mHealth is growing extremely fast. However, despite the increasing investment and interest in eHealth, several challenges still need to be overcome to enable broader and more systematic implementation of ICT in healthcare.
methodsThis study presents data from the survey "Barriers and facilitators of Personalised Medicine implementation- qualitative study under Regions4PerMed (H2020) project". In addition, this paper discusses the results of the conference, Health Technology in Connected & Integrated Care, held under the Horizon 2020 project and interregional coordination for a fast and deep uptake of personalised health (Regions4Permed) (July 2020-online conference). The above sections were preceded by an analysis of existing articles.
resultsThe data obtained from the surveys show that the main barriers to the adoption of eHealth and mHealth are the lack of skills of seniors, but also the lack of user-friendly technology and a simple user interface. Access to individual data while ensuring its security and the lack of digitisation of medical data are also serious issues. In addition, medical digital solutions are overly fragmented due to national legislations that deviate from the General Data Protection Regulation.
conclusionsBy using technological solutions, it is possible to improve diagnosis and treatment decisions, and better adapt treatment and reduce its duration and cost. However, there are still barriers to the development of eHealth. Clear recommendations for implementation are needed to enable further development of personalised eHealth and mHealth solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.