Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35330437›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2022

Machine Learning Model-Based Simple Clinical Information to Predict Decreased Left Atrial Appendage Flow Velocity.

Chao Li, Guanhua Dou, Yipu Ding, Ran Xin, Jing Wang, Jun Guo, Yundai Chen, Junjie Yang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Primer on Machine Learning in Electrophysiology.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chao LiChinese PLA Medical School, Haidian District, Beijing 100039, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1924-6855
Guanhua DouChinese PLA General Hospital, Haidian District, Beijing 100039, China.
Yipu DingSchool of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China.
Ran XinSchool of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2866-9569
Jing WangChinese PLA General Hospital, Haidian District, Beijing 100039, China.
Jun GuoDepartment of Cardiology, The Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Haidian District, Beijing 100039, China.
Yundai ChenDepartment of Cardiology, The Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Haidian District, Beijing 100039, China.
Junjie YangDepartment of Cardiology, The Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Haidian District, Beijing 100039, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8032-1418
Chinese PLA General Hospital · CNNankai University · CNBeijing Haidian Hospital · CN

Funding

Medical Big Data Program of PLAGH 2019MBD-035the National Key R&D Program of China 2016YFC1300304the National Key R&D Program of China 2021YFC2500505
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is the first technique of choice for evaluating the left atrial appendage flow velocity (LAAV) in clinical practice, which may cause some complications. Therefore, clinicians require a simple applicable method to screen patients with decreased LAAV. Therefore, we investigated the feasibility and accuracy of a machine learning (ML) model to predict LAAV. Method: The analysis included patients with atrial fibrillation who visited the general hospital of PLA and underwent transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) between January 2017 and December 2020. Three machine learning algorithms were used to predict LAAV. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was measured to evaluate diagnostic accuracy. Results: Of the 1039 subjects, 125 patients (12%) were determined as having decreased LAAV (LAAV < 25 cm/s). Patients with decreased LAAV were fatter and showed a higher prevalence of persistent AF, heart failure, hypertension, diabetes and stroke, and the decreased LAAV group had a larger left atrium diameter and a higher serum level of NT-pro BNP than the control group (p < 0.05). Three machine-learning models (SVM model, RF model, and KNN model) were developed to predict LAAV. In the test data, the RF model performs best (R = 0.608, AUC = 0.89) among the three models. A fivefold cross-validation scheme further verified the predictive ability of the RF model. In the RF model, NT-proBNP was the factor with the strongest impact. Conclusions: A machine learning model (Random Forest model)-based simple clinical information showed good performance in predicting LAAV. The tool for the screening of decreased LAAV patients may be very helpful in the risk classification of patients with a high risk of LAA thrombosis.

Indexed as

atrial fibrillationflow velocityleft atrial appendagemachine learning

Identifiers

PMID35330437
PMCPMC8954392
OpenAlexW4220701358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.