Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35330421›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2022

Real-World Impact of a Pharmacogenomics-Enriched Comprehensive Medication Management Program.

Joseph P Jarvis, Arul Prakasam Peter, Murray Keogh, Vince Baldasare, Gina M Beanland, Zachary T Wilkerson, Steven Kradel, Jeffrey A Shaman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Decoding Pharmacogenomic Test Interpretation and Application to Patient Care.Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Overcoming Barriers to Discovery and Implementation of Equitable Pharmacogenomic Testing in Oncology.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Joseph P JarvisCoriell Life Sciences, Philadelphia, PA 19112, USA.
Arul Prakasam PeterCoriell Life Sciences, Philadelphia, PA 19112, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4706-5165
Murray KeoghCoriell Life Sciences, Philadelphia, PA 19112, USA.
Vince BaldasareCoriell Life Sciences, Philadelphia, PA 19112, USA.
Gina M BeanlandKnow Your Rx Coalition, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40502, USA.
Zachary T WilkersonKnow Your Rx Coalition, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40502, USA.
Steven KradelCoriell Life Sciences, Philadelphia, PA 19112, USA.
Jeffrey A ShamanCoriell Life Sciences, Philadelphia, PA 19112, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7397-5755

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The availability of clinical decision support systems (CDSS) and other methods for personalizing medicine now allows evaluation of their real-world impact on healthcare delivery. For example, addressing issues associated with polypharmacy in older patients using pharmacogenomics (PGx) and comprehensive medication management (CMM) is thought to hold great promise for meaningful improvements across the goals of the Quadruple Aim. However, few studies testing these tools at scale, using relevant system-wide metrics, and under real-world conditions, have been published to date. Here, we document a reduction of ~$7000 per patient in direct medical charges (a total of $37 million over 5288 enrollees compared to 22,357 non-enrolled) in Medicare Advantage patients (≥65 years) receiving benefits through a state retirement system over the first 32 months of a voluntary PGx-enriched CMM program. We also observe a positive shift in healthcare resource utilization (HRU) away from acute care services and toward more sustainable and cost-effective primary care options. Together with improvements in medication risk assessment, patient/provider communication via pharmacist-mediated medication action plans (MAP), and the sustained positive trends in HRU, we suggest these results validate the use of a CDSS to unify PGx and CMM to optimize care for this and similar patient populations.

Indexed as

adverse drug reactionsclinical decision support systemscomprehensive medication managementcost analysishealth resourcespersonalized medicinepharmacogenomicspolypharmacypopulation healthtreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID35330421
PMCPMC8949247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.