ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2022
Education and Training of Non-Genetics Providers on the Return of Genome Sequencing Results in a NICU Setting.
Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Benefits and barriers to broad implementation of genomic sequencing in the NICU.American journal of human genetics · 2025Pooled it
- Integrating paediatric subspecialists into the delivery of genomic medicine: A qualitative study.Paediatrics & child health · 2026Article
- Interaction of identity and beliefs with genetic literacy.American journal of human genetics · 2026Article
- Opportunities to cultivate trust through communication behaviors.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Case-based genomics education and training of neurologists: an Egyptian initiative.Journal of community genetics · 2025Article
- The Role of Genetic Testing in Palliative Care Decisions for Critically Ill Newborns.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Rapid Whole-Genome Sequencing in Critically Ill Infants and Children with Suspected, Undiagnosed Genetic Diseases: Evolution to a First-Tier Clinical Laboratory Test in the Era of Precision Medicine.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The BabySeq Project: A clinical trial of genome sequencing in a diverse cohort of infants.American journal of human genetics · 2024Article
- "It's hard to wait": Provider perspectives on current genomic care in safety-net NICUs.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2024Article
- Article
- Rapid genomic testing in critically ill patients with genetic conditions: position statement by the Human Genetics Society of Australasia.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2024Article
- Provision and availability of genomic medicine services in Level IV neonatal intensive care units.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2023Article
- Role of genomic medicine and implementing equitable access for critically ill infants in neonatal intensive care units.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023Review
- Are Graduate Medical Trainees Prepared for the Personalized Genomic Medicine Revolution? Trainee Perspectives at One Institution.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Parents' Perspectives on the Utility of Genomic Sequencing in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Genetics follow up after rapid genomic sequencing in intensive care: current practices and recommendations for service delivery.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2022Article
- Parents and Provider Perspectives on the Return of Genomic Findings for Cleft Families in Africa.AJOB empirical bioethicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
To meet current and expected future demand for genome sequencing in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), adjustments to traditional service delivery models are necessary. Effective programs for the training of non-genetics providers (NGPs) may address the known barriers to providing genetic services including limited genetics knowledge and lack of confidence. The SouthSeq project aims to use genome sequencing to make genomic diagnoses in the neonatal period and evaluate a scalable approach to delivering genome sequencing results to populations with limited access to genetics professionals. Thirty-three SouthSeq NGPs participated in a live, interactive training intervention and completed surveys before and after participation. Here, we describe the protocol for the provider training intervention utilized in the SouthSeq study and the associated impact on NGP knowledge and confidence in reviewing, interpreting, and using genome sequencing results. Participation in the live training intervention led to an increased level of confidence in critical skills needed for real-world implementation of genome sequencing. Providers reported a significant increase in confidence level in their ability to review, understand, and use genome sequencing result reports to guide patient care. Reported barriers to implementation of genome sequencing in a NICU setting included test cost, lack of insurance coverage, and turn around time. As implementation of genome sequencing in this setting progresses, effective education of NGPs is critical to provide access to high-quality and timely genomic medicine care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.