Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35330361›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2022

Magnetic Resonance-Based Synthetic Computed Tomography Using Generative Adversarial Networks for Intracranial Tumor Radiotherapy Treatment Planning.

Chun-Chieh Wang, Pei-Huan Wu, Gigin Lin, Yen-Ling Huang, Yu-Chun Lin, Yi-Peng Eve Chang, Jun-Cheng Weng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chun-Chieh WangDepartment of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, and Graduate Institute of Artificial Intelligence, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan.
Pei-Huan WuDepartment of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, and Graduate Institute of Artificial Intelligence, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan.
Gigin LinDepartment of Medical Imaging and Intervention and Institute for Radiological Research, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-7246-1058
Yen-Ling HuangDepartment of Medical Imaging and Intervention and Institute for Radiological Research, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan.
Yu-Chun LinDepartment of Medical Imaging and Intervention and Institute for Radiological Research, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-6841-5366
Yi-Peng Eve ChangDepartment of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Jun-Cheng WengDepartment of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, and Graduate Institute of Artificial Intelligence, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-7616-6216

Funding

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou CMRPD1H0421Chang Gung University NMRPD1L0311Ministry of Science and Technology MOST110-2221-E-182-027, MOST110-2628-B-182A-018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to develop a reliable deep-learning-based method that is capable of synthesizing needed CT from MRI for radiotherapy treatment planning. Simultaneously, we try to enhance the resolution of synthetic CT. We adopted pix2pix with a 3D framework, which is a conditional generative adversarial network, to map the MRI data domain into the CT data domain of our dataset. The original dataset contains paired MRI and CT images of 31 subjects; 26 pairs were used for model training and 5 were used for model validation. To identify the correctness of the synthetic CT of models, all of the synthetic CTs were calculated by the quantized image similarity formulas: cosine angle distance, Euclidean distance, mean square error, peak signal-to-noise ratio, and mean structural similarity. Two radiologists independently evaluated the satisfaction score, including spatial, detail, contrast, noise, and artifacts, for each imaging attribute. The mean (±standard deviation) of the structural similarity indices (CAD, L2 norm, MSE, PSNR, and MSSIM) between five real CT scans and the synthetic CT scans were 0.96 ± 0.015, 76.83 ± 12.06, 0.00118 ± 0.00037, 29.47 ± 1.35, and 0.84 ± 0.036, respectively. For synthetic CT, radiologists rated the results as evincing excellent satisfaction in spatial geometry and noise level, good satisfaction in contrast and artifacts, and fair imaging details. The similarity index and clinical evaluation results between synthetic CT and original CT guarantee the usability of the proposed method.

Indexed as

attenuation correctionbrain tumordeep learninggenerative adversarial net (GAN)MR-only simulationradiotherapy planning

Identifiers

PMID35330361
PMCPMC8955512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.