Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35330327›Full record

ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2022

Cancer Angiogenesis and Opportunity of Influence on Tumor by Changing Vascularization.

Igor Maiborodin, Alfija Mansurova, Alexander Chernyavskiy, Alexander Romanov, Vladimir Voitcitctkii, Anna Kedrova, Alexander Tarkhov, Alena Chernyshova, Sergey Krasil'nikov

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Igor MaiborodinThe E. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Ministry of Health of Russia, 30055 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Alfija MansurovaThe E. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Ministry of Health of Russia, 30055 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Alexander ChernyavskiyThe E. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Ministry of Health of Russia, 30055 Novosibirsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0540-3357
Alexander RomanovThe E. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Ministry of Health of Russia, 30055 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Vladimir VoitcitctkiiThe E. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Ministry of Health of Russia, 30055 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Anna KedrovaThe E. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Ministry of Health of Russia, 30055 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Alexander TarkhovThe E. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Ministry of Health of Russia, 30055 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Alena ChernyshovaTomsk National Research Medical Center, Cancer Research Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, 634009 Tomsk, Russia.
Sergey Krasil'nikovThe E. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Ministry of Health of Russia, 30055 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation · RURussian Academy of Sciences · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Based on the study of recent scientific literature devoted to neovascularization and angiogenesis in malignant neoplasms, it was concluded that there are many publications on each of the problems of tumor angiogenesis and vascularization. The formation of blood vessels in a tumor and certain aspects of the prognostic value of the severity of vascularization in almost all forms of cancer are considered. Special attention is paid to the peculiarities of angiogenesis in tumors of the female reproductive system. A large number of vessels in the tumor often indicates a poor prognosis. The influence of various factors on the initiation of angiogenesis and the process itself, as well as the possibility of suppressing such signals to slow down the formation of blood vessels and thus the development of the tumor are widely studied. The results of pharmacological suppression of tumor vessel formation demonstrate a good clinical outcome but one accompanied by a large number of severe adverse side effects. Such a significant amount of studies on each of the problems of tumor vascularization indicates the increasing importance of this area of oncology. At the same time, only a very small number of works are devoted to the study of the differences in angiogenesis and number of vessels between different parts of the tumor, as well as between the primary tumor node and its metastases. The refinement of the results is still to be done. It was noted that the expression of proangiogenic factors in metastases is usually higher than in the source of metastasis, and the expression in lymphogenous metastases is higher than in hematogenous ones.

Indexed as

angiogenesiscancertumorvascularizationvasculogenesisvessels

Identifiers

PMID35330327
PMCPMC8954734
OpenAlexW4213439461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.