Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35330228›Full record

ReviewJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Current Insight into Traditional and Modern Methods in Fungal Diversity Estimates.

Ajay Kumar Gautam, Rajnish Kumar Verma, Shubhi Avasthi, Sushma, Yogita Bohra, Bandarupalli Devadatha, Mekala Niranjan, Nakarin Suwannarach

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Fungal Communities in Various Environments.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ajay Kumar GautamSchool of Agriculture, Abhilashi University, Mandi 175028, Himachal Pradesh, India.
Rajnish Kumar VermaDepartment of Plant Pathology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141004, Punjab, India.
Shubhi AvasthiSchool of Studies in Botany, Jiwaji University, Gwalior 474011, Madhya Pradesh, India.
SushmaDepartment of Biosciences, Chandigarh University, Gharuan 140413, Punjab, India.
Yogita BohraDepartment of Plant Pathology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141004, Punjab, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1613-8314
Bandarupalli DevadathaFungal Biotechnology Lab, Department of Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Pondicherry University, Kalapet 605014, Pondicherry, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6400-5407
Mekala NiranjanDepartment of Botany, Rajiv Gandhi University, Rono Hills, Doimukh, Itanagar 791112, Arunachal Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1182-231X
Nakarin SuwannarachResearch Center of Microbial Diversity and Sustainable Utilization, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-2653-1913

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fungi are an important and diverse component in various ecosystems. The methods to identify different fungi are an important step in any mycological study. Classical methods of fungal identification, which rely mainly on morphological characteristics and modern use of DNA based molecular techniques, have proven to be very helpful to explore their taxonomic identity. In the present compilation, we provide detailed information on estimates of fungi provided by different mycologistsover time. Along with this, a comprehensive analysis of the importance of classical and molecular methods is also presented. In orderto understand the utility of genus and species specific markers in fungal identification, a polyphasic approach to investigate various fungi is also presented in this paper. An account of the study of various fungi based on culture-based and cultureindependent methods is also provided here to understand the development and significance of both approaches. The available information on classical and modern methods compiled in this study revealed that the DNA based molecular studies are still scant, and more studies are required to achieve the accurate estimation of fungi present on earth.

Indexed as

classical and molecular methodsfungal diversityfungal phylogenyidentificationtaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID35330228
PMCPMC8955040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.