Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35330182›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Why Is the UAG (Amber) Stop Codon Almost Absent in Highly Expressed Bacterial Genes?

Dominique Belin, Pere Puigbò

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Expanding the Genetic Code ofACS chemical biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dominique BelinDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, University of Geneva, CH1201 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4686-339X
Pere PuigbòDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, 20500 Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-0072-8726

Funding

Agencia Estatal de Investigación (Spain) PTQ2018-009846
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genome hypothesis postulates that genes in a genome tend to conform to their species' usage of the codon catalog and the GC content of the DNA. Thus, codon frequencies differ across organisms, including the three termination codons in the standard genetic code. Here, we analyze the frequencies of stop codons in a group of highly expressed genes from 196 prokaryotes under strong translational selection. The occurrence of the three translation termination codons is highly biased, with UAA (ochre) being the most prevalent in almost all bacteria. In contrast, UAG (amber) is the least frequent termination codon, e.g., only 321 occurrences (7.4%) in

Indexed as

bacterial genomescodon prevalencecodon usagegenegenomegenome hypothesishighly expressed genesnon-sensestop codonstranslational selectiontranslation termination

Identifiers

PMID35330182
PMCPMC8954436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.